Review3 Biotech2024
Ex vivo and miniaturized in vitro
Review in 3 Biotech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Recent Developments and Applicability of In Vitro Gut Microbiota Models in Biomedical Research and Digestive Diseases-A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Next-generation probiotics: an outlook into current applications and future developments.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026Review
- Article
- From functional ingredients to bioactive compounds: a review of their role in commercial pet food.Veterinary research communications · 2026Review
- Development of a novel humanized gut-brain axis model as a tool toward personalized nutrition.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Ex vivo study of neuroinvasive and neurotropic viruses: what is current and what is next.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Role of gut-brain axis dysregulation in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: mechanisms and therapeutic implications.American journal of translational research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The microbiota-gut-brain axis involves complex bidirectional communication through neural, immune, and endocrine pathways. Microbial metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids, influence gut motility and brain function by interacting with gut receptors and modulating hormone release. Additionally, microbial components such as lipopolysaccharides and cytokines can cross the gut epithelium and the blood-brain barrier, impacting immune responses and cognitive function. Ex vivo models, which preserve gut tissue and neural segments, offer insight into localized gut-brain communication by allowing for detailed study of nerve excitability in response to microbial signals, but they are limited in systemic complexity. Miniaturized in vitro models, including organ-on-chip platforms, enable precise control of the cellular environment and simulate complex microbiota-host interactions. These systems allow for the study of microbial metabolites, immune responses, and neuronal activity, providing valuable insights into gut-brain communication. Despite challenges such as replicating long-term biological processes and integrating immune and hormonal systems, advancements in bioengineered platforms are enhancing the physiological relevance of these models, offering new opportunities for understanding the mechanisms of the microbiota-gut-brain axis. This review aims to describe the ex vivo and miniaturized in vitro models which are used to mimic the in vivo conditions and facilitate more precise studies of gut brain communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.