Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39464520›Full record

Review3 Biotech2024

Ex vivo and miniaturized in vitro

Vinod Kumar Yata

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in 3 Biotech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vinod Kumar YataDepartment of Molecular Biology, Central University of Andhrapradesh, Ananthapuramu - 515701, Andhrapradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7552-8825

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiota-gut-brain axis involves complex bidirectional communication through neural, immune, and endocrine pathways. Microbial metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids, influence gut motility and brain function by interacting with gut receptors and modulating hormone release. Additionally, microbial components such as lipopolysaccharides and cytokines can cross the gut epithelium and the blood-brain barrier, impacting immune responses and cognitive function. Ex vivo models, which preserve gut tissue and neural segments, offer insight into localized gut-brain communication by allowing for detailed study of nerve excitability in response to microbial signals, but they are limited in systemic complexity. Miniaturized in vitro models, including organ-on-chip platforms, enable precise control of the cellular environment and simulate complex microbiota-host interactions. These systems allow for the study of microbial metabolites, immune responses, and neuronal activity, providing valuable insights into gut-brain communication. Despite challenges such as replicating long-term biological processes and integrating immune and hormonal systems, advancements in bioengineered platforms are enhancing the physiological relevance of these models, offering new opportunities for understanding the mechanisms of the microbiota-gut-brain axis. This review aims to describe the ex vivo and miniaturized in vitro models which are used to mimic the in vivo conditions and facilitate more precise studies of gut brain communication.

Indexed as

Gut brain axisMicrobiomeMicrobiotaMicrofluidicsOrgan on chip

Identifiers

PMID39464520
PMCPMC11502650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.