ArticleACS omega2024
Does the Formation of a Taylor Cone in a Pulsating Electrospray Directly Impact Mass Spectrometry Signals?
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Negative Gaseous Ions in Positive-Voltage Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Rapid and sensitive detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using electrochemically assisted derivatization mass spectrometry.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Critical Role of Voltage Application Points in "Analog" and "Digital" Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrospray ionization (ESI) remains the dominant technique in mass spectrometry (MS)-based analyses. Here, we investigated the relationship between a crucial aspect of ESI, the formation of the Taylor cone, and the MS ion current by utilizing a triple quadrupole (QqQ) mass spectrometer coupled with a streaming high-speed camera and a 3-ring electrode system. In one test, ion current over a 30-s plume gate (a ring electrode) opening was compared with the Taylor cone occurrence analyzed offline, with Spearman's correlation coefficients consistently near 0 despite parameter variations. In another test, real-time detection of Taylor cones was synchronized with QqQ-MS, selectively opening (de-energizing) the plume gate based on the Taylor cone status. This approach enabled matching the ion current with the Taylor cone occurrence. There was no apparent difference between the MS signals recorded in the presence and absence of a Taylor cone. Additionally, a Faraday plate was employed as a detector in offline experiments, revealing agreement between the frequency of liquid meniscus (Taylor cone) oscillation (∼1.92 kHz)-measured by high-speed imaging-and the frequency of spray current (∼1.93 kHz). We suggest that the lack of positive correlations in the MS experiments is due to intrinsic ion carryover during transit from the ion source to the detector and due to the insufficient data acquisition rate of the mass spectrometer, which erases short-term fluctuations of ion current.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.