ReviewTranslational sports medicine2024
Athlete Monitoring Systems in Elite Men's Basketball: Challenges, Recommendations, and Future Perspectives.
Review in Translational sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monitoring of internal load, sleep, and well-being in relation to injury and illness in professional basketball.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Integration without decoupling? Hybrid governance and systemic equity in the proposed NBA-FIBA European League.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- A comparison between the planned and actual external loads experienced during training in a professional, male basketball team.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Athlete monitoring in handball (ATHMON HB): a survey of current practice in professional women's and men's handball.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Neural correlates of basketball proficiency: An MRI study across skill levels.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Athlete monitoring systems (AMSs) provide a centralized platform for integrating, processing, analyzing, and graphing various monitoring data to help coaches manage the rigorous demands of elite men's basketball players, who frequently participate in high-stress games with minimal recovery time. This review synthesizes current challenges in deploying AMSs, underscores their role in injury prevention and performance optimization, and discusses technological advances that could enhance their utility. Key challenges include selecting appropriate monitoring methods based on human and financial resources, accuracy of data collection, real-time data processing, and personalization of training regimens. Due to the weaknesses and limitations of each monitoring method, it is recommended that both objective (e.g., external load data, heart rate measures, and biomarkers) and subjective (athlete-reported outcome measures) monitoring data be integrated into an AMS to provide a holistic insight of the athlete's health and readiness. In addition, decision support systems integrated into an AMS can help coaches quickly gain an overview of their players' current condition and make informed decisions about daily load and recovery management. In this context, future perspectives suggest the potential for AMSs to incorporate predictive analytics and artificial intelligence to further enhance decision-making processes in elite men's basketball. Our findings underscore the need for continued innovation and rigorous validation of AMS technologies to ensure they meet the evolving demands of professional sports environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.