Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39464382›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Bridging Perspectives, Building Resilience: Safety-II Guided Reflexive Dialogues Between Care Professionals and Clients as Part of Developing Integrated Maternity Care.

Sarah R Lips, Jolanda C G Boxem-Tiemessen, Anna M Ligthart, Tjerk Jan Schuitmaker-Warnaar, Martine C de Bruijne, Corine J M Verhoeven, Petra Verdonk, Ank de Jonge

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah R LipsAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Ethics, Law & Humanities, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0860-3562
Jolanda C G Boxem-TiemessenAmsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anna M LigthartIndependent client of VSV Westfriesland-Waterland/IGO Geboortehart, The Netherlands.
Tjerk Jan Schuitmaker-WarnaarAthena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5158-581X
Martine C de BruijneAmsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1838-1158
Corine J M VerhoevenAmsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-0888
Petra VerdonkAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Ethics, Law & Humanities, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0464-8210
Ank de JongeAmsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-3744

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Limitations of traditional structures and approaches to further enhance patient safety, satisfaction, and systemic sustainability in healthcare, are becoming increasingly visible. Embedding reflexivity is a proposed strategy to promote progress. We aimed to explore the potential of creating reflexive spaces for promoting integration and client-centeredness in maternity care specifically. Methods: In this participatory action research (PAR), two multidisciplinary and multiorganizational groups of maternity care professionals and clients (n = 28) from two Dutch regions, participated in 'reflexive dialogues'. Cases were discussed from a Safety-II perspective. In total, 22 meetings took place from 2020-2022, mostly online. Additionally, 23 participants were interviewed. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Findings: Participants were generally positive about the reflexive dialogues and Safety-II approach. They felt both safe and challenged to critically reflect on their own and each other's care practices. Exchanging perspectives, experiences, and approaches fostered trust, well-being, and repertoire, and through this, resilience. Conclusions: By structurally stimulating, facilitating, and embedding Safety-II guided reflexive dialogues between professionals and clients from multiple organizations and disciplines, healthcare leaders could promote resilience and reinforce the transformation towards integrated, relation-centered maternity care.

Indexed as

dialogueintegrated maternity careparticipatory action researchreflexivityrelation-centered careresilienceSafety-II

Identifiers

PMID39464382
PMCPMC11505032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.