Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39464251›Full record

ArticleCurrent psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)2024

A Systematic Review of Social Support Instruments for Measurement-Based Care in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

John C Fortney, Natalia Garcia, Tracy L Simpson, Elizabeth R Bird, Andrew D Carlo, Samuel Rennebohm, Sarah B Campbell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Scoping Review of Instruments Used in Measuring Social Support among Refugees in Resettlement.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John C FortneyVA Health Services Research and Development, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9409-8894
Natalia GarciaDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2722-8438
Tracy L SimpsonDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3333-9735
Elizabeth R BirdMental Health Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9309-8451
Andrew D CarloDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4349-9644
Samuel RennebohmSwedish Family Medicine Residency - First Hill, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0823-5539
Sarah B CampbellVA Health Services Research and Development, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1303-8107

Funding

Training Geriatric Mental Health Services ResearchersT32MH073553 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI BRUCE, MARTHA L · 2005 to 2019
$6.4M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH073553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Social support is a treatment target for individuals with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) but is not systematically assessed in clinical care. This review evaluated the quality of patient-reported social support instruments used in PTSD research to identify candidates for measurement-based care (MBC) with this population. Method: A systematic review identified all validated measures of social support used in research with traumatized populations after 1990. Instrument development/validation studies were then evaluated using components of the updated COSMIN guidelines. Instruments were rated for clinical utility and evidence of their psychometric properties in use with traumatized individuals was synthesized. Results: Twenty-nine instruments were identified across 231 studies. Evaluation of development articles found 14 instruments with sufficient evidence of content validity and internal consistency reliability that could be considered for clinical use. Of these, nine had comparable properties in traumatized samples and could be preliminarily included in MBC of social support in the treatment of PTSD. Additional studies on measures' responsiveness and test-retest reliability are needed. Conclusions: Existing measures of social support could improve clinical care of PTSD when used routinely to provide feedback on this critical component of health. MBC of social support may also improve clinical care of other psychiatric conditions.

Indexed as

measurementmeasurement-based carePTSDsocial support

Identifiers

PMID39464251
PMCPMC11500747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.