ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Stroke impairs the proactive control of dynamic balance during predictable treadmill accelerations.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We maintain balance during gait using both proactive and reactive control strategies. Damage to the brain from a stroke impairs reactive balance, but little is known about how a stroke impacts proactive control during walking. Stroke-related impairments to proactive control could become targets for interventions designed to improve responses to predictable disturbances and reduce fall risk. Therefore, we determined if proactive strategies during predictable treadmill accelerations differed between people post-stroke (n=14) and people without stroke (n=14). Both groups walked with accelerations at random (every one to five strides) and regular (every three strides) intervals. We quantified the effects of the perturbations as changes to center of mass (COM) speed and used mechanical leg work to quantify the proactive strategies to slow the COM. Participants without stroke reduced peak COM speed better than those with stroke when perturbations were regular (-0.016 versus +0.004 m/s; p=0.007). They also reduced positive leg work more during the perturbation step than the group post-stroke (-5.7% versus +2.5%; p=0.003). One implication of these findings is that people post-stroke may be more susceptible to falls during predictable gait disturbances, and future work should identify the underlying impairments that cause these deficits.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.