ReviewCureus2024
The Role of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Shock waves as a preventive impulse : New approaches to reducing surgical and postoperative complications, including tissue regeneration].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Neuromodulation strategies in postburn care for pain rehabilitation and scar remodelling.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in burn scar repair: Advances in immunoactivation-based scar remodeling research.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Influence of extracorporeal shockwaves on macrophage polarization in a 3D collagen matrix.Regenerative therapy · 2025Article
- Cell-free adipose extract inhibits hypertrophic scar formation through collagen remodeling and antiangiogenesis.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keloids and hypertrophic scars are pathological scars that result from a prolonged and aberrant response to wound healing, resulting in raised and thickened skin lesions. Traditional treatments include occlusive dressings, compression therapy, intralesional steroids, and surgical excision with refashioning. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a non-invasive treatment method that employs mechanotransduction to stimulate a biological cascade resulting in tissue regeneration. This review aims to explore the literature for published evidence on the role of ESWT in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. A literature search following the PRISMA guidelines was conducted on PUBMED, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, for studies demonstrating the use of ESWT in keloids and hypertrophic scars. From this, 79 articles were identified, 12 of which met the eligibility criteria and were thus analyzed and included in the study. As monotherapy for keloids, ESWT showed comparable improvements in functional and aesthetic outcomes compared to traditional intralesional steroid therapy. Keloids treated with combination therapy of ESWT with intralesional steroids had better outcomes than those treated with intralesional steroids alone. Improvements in hypertrophic scar cosmesis, discomfort, and function with the use of ESWT were reported. Histologic improvements such as decreased collagen content, reduction of fibrotic markers, and fibrogenic cytokines were also described. ESWT is a promising treatment modality for pathological scars, offering comparable outcomes to traditional therapies with added benefits such as non-invasiveness. Further research is warranted to establish optimal protocols and its role in pathological scar management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.