Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39463895›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Attitude toward vital signs monitoring and its predictors among clinical nurses in Saudi Arabia.

Abdualrahman Saeed Alshehry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abdualrahman Saeed AlshehryMedical-Surgical Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positive attitudes toward assessing vital signs are essential in ensuring quality assessments and recognizing patients' declining conditions. However, few studies have been conducted that examine the attitudes of nurses toward this fundamental nursing skill. This research investigated the predictors of clinical nurses' attitudes toward vital signs monitoring in identifying the patients' deteriorating state. A cross-sectional, correlational study was conducted in two hospitals in Saudi Arabia. A sample of 427 clinical nurses was surveyed from February 2023 and April 2023 using a questionnaire on attitudes toward vital signs monitoring. The subscale "key indicators" achieved the highest mean, followed by "workload," "communication," and "knowledge." The hospital where the nurses work (Hospitals 1 and 2), younger age, gender (being male), marital status (being single), clinical area (working in intensive care unit), number of handled patients per shift (handling 11-20 and > 20 patients), and longer years of experience were identified as significant predictors of the nurses' positive attitude toward vital signs monitoring. This research provides valuable knowledge on which aspect of the attitudes toward vital signs monitoring necessitates educational enhancement among clinical nurses. The factors influencing the clinical nurses' attitude toward vital signs monitoring reported in this study may be useful for nurse managers and other hospital policymakers in developing focused continuing educational interventions targeting enhanced vital signs monitoring competencies.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelVital SignsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicNursesNursing Staff, HospitalSaudi ArabiaSurveys and Questionnairesattitudesclinical nursesnursing practicepredictorSaudi Arabiavital signsvital signs monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39463895
PMCPMC11502396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.