Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39463849›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

Compared to Trabeculectomy, Ex-Press

Mitsuya Otsuka, Naoki Tojo, Hitoshi Yamazaki, Tomoko Ueda-Consolvo, Atsushi Hayashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mitsuya OtsukaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8560-9901
Naoki TojoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8036-4781
Hitoshi YamazakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Tomoko Ueda-ConsolvoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Atsushi HayashiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2885-1141

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We compared the corneal endothelial cell loss between trabeculectomy (Trab) and Ex-Press Patients and Methods: This was a single-facility retrospective study. We analyzed the cases of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pre-operative IOP ≤ 21 mmHg who had undergone Trab or EXP surgery and were followed for >3 years. Noncontact specular microscopy was used to determine the corneal endothelial cell density (CED) before and after Trab or EXP surgery. We measured the CED at 12, 24, and 36 months post-surgery. We compared the CED values and CED survival ratio after both surgeries using paired t-tests. Results: We included 39 eyes that underwent Trab and 36 eyes that underwent EXP surgery. In the Trab group, the mean CED value had decreased from 2333 ± 399 at baseline to 2066 ± 587 cells/mm2 after 3 years. In the EXP group, the mean CED value had decreased from 2320 ± 393 at baseline to 2229 ± 460 cells/mm Conclusion: Compared to trabeculectomy, Ex-Press

Indexed as

corneal endothelial cellEx-Pressglaucomatrabeculectomy

Identifiers

PMID39463849
PMCPMC11512528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.