Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39463843›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2024

The CO-produced Psychosocial INtervention delivered by GPs to young people after self-harm (COPING): protocol for a feasibility study.

Faraz Mughal, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Benjamin Saunders, Sarah A Lawton, Sarah Lewis, Jo Smith, Gillian Lancaster, Ellen Townsend, Christopher J Armitage, Peter Bower and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Faraz MughalSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5437-5962
Carolyn A Chew-GrahamSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9722-9981
Benjamin SaundersSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, England, UK.
Sarah A LawtonSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, England, UK.
Sarah LewisSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3992-6938
Jo SmithSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9030-4110
Gillian LancasterSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, England, UK.
Ellen TownsendSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England, UK.
Christopher J ArmitageManchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2365-1765
Peter BowerCentre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK.
Nav KapurNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK.
David KesslerCentre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK.
Alba X RealpePopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK.
Nicola WilesCentre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK.
Dennis OugrinYouth Resilience Unit, Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development, Queen Mary University of London, London, England, UK.
Martyn LewisSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, England, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Self-harm in young people is a growing concern and reducing rates a global priority. Rates of self-harm documented in general practice have been increasing for young people in the UK in the last two decades, especially in 13-16-year-olds. General practitioners (GPs) can intervene early after self-harm but there are no effective treatments presently available. We developed the GP-led COPING intervention, in partnership with young people with lived experience and GPs, to be delivered to young people 16-25 years across two consultations. This study aims to examine the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a fully powered effectiveness trial of the COPING intervention in NHS general practice. Methods: This will be a mixed-methods external non-randomised before-after single arm feasibility study in NHS general practices in the West Midlands, England. Patients aged 16-25 years who have self-harmed in the last 12 months will be eligible to receive COPING. Feasibility outcomes will be recruitment rates, intervention delivery, retention rates, and completion of follow-up outcome measures. All participants will receive COPING with a target sample of 31 with final follow-up data collection at six months from baseline. Clinical data such as self-harm repetition will be collected. A nested qualitative study and national survey of GPs will explore COPING acceptability, deliverability, implementation, and likelihood of contamination. Discussion: Brief GP-led interventions for young people after self-harm are needed to address national guideline and policy recommendations. This study of the COPING intervention will assess whether a main trial is feasible. Registration: ISRCTN (ISRCTN16572400; 28.11.2023).

Indexed as

feasibilitygeneral practicegeneral practitionermixed methodsProtocolself-harmyoung people

Identifiers

PMID39463843
PMCPMC11503009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.