Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39463809›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2024

The Dunning‒Kruger effect in resident predicted and actual performance on the American Board of Emergency Medicine in-training examination.

Theodore J Gaeta, Earl Reisdorff, Melissa Barton, Kim M Feldhaus, Marianne Gausche-Hill, Deepi Goyal, Kevin Joldersma, Chadd K Kraus, Felix Ankel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Early career psychiatrists' ability to evaluate and manage negative symptoms of schizophrenia - Results from a European survey.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Theodore J GaetaDepartment of Emergency Medicine New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital Brooklyn New York USA.
Earl ReisdorffAmerican Board of Emergency Medicine East Lansing Michigan USA.
Melissa BartonAmerican Board of Emergency Medicine East Lansing Michigan USA.
Kim M FeldhausDepartment of Emergency Medicine Boulder Community Health Boulder Colorado USA.
Marianne Gausche-HillDepartments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Los Angeles California USA.
Deepi GoyalDepartment of Emergency Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA.
Kevin JoldersmaAmerican Board of Emergency Medicine East Lansing Michigan USA.
Chadd K KrausAmerican Board of Emergency Medicine East Lansing Michigan USA.
Felix AnkelDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Regions Hospital University of Minnesota Medical School St. Paul Minnesota USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The Dunning-Kruger effect (DKE) is a cognitive bias wherein individuals who are unskilled overestimate their abilities, while those who are skilled tend to underestimate their capabilities. The purpose of this investigation is to determine if the DKE exists among American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) in-training examination (ITE) participants. Methods: This is a prospective, cross-sectional survey of residents in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited emergency medicine (EM) residency programs. All residents who took the 2022 ABEM ITE were eligible for inclusion. Residents from international programs, residents in combined training programs, and those who did not complete the voluntary post-ITE survey were excluded. Half of the residents taking the ITE were asked to predict their self-assessment of performance (percent correct), and the other half were asked to predict their performance relative to peers at the same level of training (quintile estimate). Pearson's correlation ( Results: A total of 7568 of 8918 (84.9%) residents completed their assigned survey question. A total of 3694 residents completed self-assessment (mean predicted percentage correct 67.4% and actual 74.6%), with a strong positive correlation (Pearson's Conclusions: EM residents demonstrated accurate self-assessment of their performance on the ABEM ITE; however, the DKE was present when comparing their self-assessments to their peers. Lower-performing residents tended to overestimate their performance, with the most significant DKE observed among the lowest-performing residents. The highest-performing residents tended to underestimate their relative performance.

Identifiers

PMID39463809
PMCPMC11502208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.