ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Robot-mediated impairment-oriented and task-specific training on upper limb post stroke: feasibility and preliminary effects on physical function and quality of life.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the feasibility and safety of conducting robot-mediated impairment training (RMIT) and robot-mediated task-specific training (RMTT). The device deployed is the Optimo Regen (OR Methods: This was a single-centre, randomized, single-blinded, two-arm, parallel group, controlled trial. Patients fulfilling criteria were randomized into either the RMIT or RMIT + RMTT group and provided with 20 h of robotic therapy on top of standard care. Results: A total of 4 patients were recruited, with 2 patients receiving treatment in each arm. The study was feasible, with a 66.7% enrolment rate, 75% completion rate, and 100% attendance for each intervention session. We achieved a 90% satisfaction rate with no serious adverse effects. All patients had improvement of motor power, Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and quality of life scores at 1 month. FIM continued to improve at 3 months post-commencement of intervention. There was relative ease of use of the device. Conclusion: This trial is feasible. A full-scale study is warranted, to compare RMIT against RMTT, which is a novel application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.