ArticleJournal of advances in medical education & professionalism2024
Estimating Students' Academic Success in the Preclinical Stage of Undergraduate Medical Education Using the Admission Test Approach.
Article in Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictive Validity of Pre-Clinical Academic Achievements in Comprehensive Basic Science Examination: A Nationwide Cohort of Iranian Medical Students.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Medical schools face substantial challenges in objectively selecting the best applicants, and the admission process can impact medical students' academic performance. This study aimed to estimate the students' academic success in the preclinical stage of undergraduate medical education using admission tests. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1,193 students' records from the 2014 to 2019 cohorts. The students' admission data comprised the cohort, sex, admission track, psychological test, and academic tests. The academic success was based on the student's end-year academic evaluation. Data were analyzed using contingency and Kendall's tau b tests with IBM Results: Most of the 1,193 preclinical medical students' records included in the study were females (68.1%), from the regular admission track (78.5%), from the considered psychology test category (52.8%), and had an academic admission test of less than or equal to the median. (51.6%). Most students (89.7%) met all the academic requirements to pass the end-year evaluation. The bivariate analyses showed significant correlations between academic success and cohort (p<0.001), psychology test (p=0.005), and academic test (p<0.001). The analyses showed no significant correlation between academic success and sex (p=0.324), and admission track (p=0.128). Conclusions: This study indicated that cohort and psychology tests could estimate the student's academic success at the preclinical stage of undergraduate medical education. The admission criteria related to the academic tests during the admission process should be re-evaluated, so that the academic tests could select the best students among the applicants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.