ArticleCureus2024
Digging Deeper to Diagnose: Cardiac Tamponade Following Tunneled Dialysis Catheter Placement.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central venous catheter (CVC) placement is a common medical intervention in hospitalized patients associated with a host of complications, including cardiac tamponade. Here, we describe a case of a 61-year-old male with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis via a right internal jugular tunneled dialysis catheter who presented to the emergency room for hypoxia at his skilled nursing facility. He had been discharged three days prior for treatment of a Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) neck abscess, during which an uncomplicated right internal jugular tunneled dialysis catheter exchange was performed one day prior to discharge. On admission, bedside point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) showed a pericardial effusion without tamponade physiology. While receiving hemodialysis on his second day of admission, he was noted to have new hypotension, and repeat POCUS was concerning for tamponade. An urgent pericardiocentesis was performed with 895 mLs of serosanguinous drainage, followed by an additional 1400 mLs of serosanguinous drainage over the next 48 hours. Interventional radiology noted a contrast leak at the distal superior vena cava at the cavoatrial junction and suspected that the etiology for hemopericardium was an endovascular injury from tunneled dialysis catheter placement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.