Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39463641›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Comparison of Air Conduction and Bone Conduction Masseter Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Between Neurotypical Young Adults and Individuals With Conductive Hearing Loss.

Bharath Kumar C, Sudharshan Pushpanathan, Yasser Abdullah, Nitish R Patel, Suresh Thontadarya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Enhanced response obtainability with chirp stimulus in bone-conducted mVEMPs.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bharath Kumar CDepartment of Hearing Studies, Dr. S. R. Chandrasekhar Institute of Speech and Hearing, Bengaluru, IND.
Sudharshan PushpanathanDepartment of Hearing Studies, Dr. S. R. Chandrasekhar Institute of Speech and Hearing, Bengaluru, IND.
Yasser AbdullahDepartment of Hearing Studies, Dr. S. R. Chandrasekhar Institute of Speech and Hearing, Bengaluru, IND.
Nitish R PatelDepartment of Hearing Studies, Dr. S. R. Chandrasekhar Institute of Speech and Hearing, Bengaluru, IND.
Suresh ThontadaryaDepartment of Audiology, Shravana Institute of Speech and Hearing, Bellary, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Masseter vestibular evoked myogenic potential (mVEMP) is an acoustically evoked potential recorded from the masseter muscle. It is a recent tool in the vestibular assessment battery that checks the integrity of the vestibulomasseteric reflex pathway, specifically for saccular function. Need of the study There is a small pool of subjects with cervical spondylitis and anomalies in the eye muscle where cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) tests cannot be performed. In such conditions, mVEMP is considered an appropriate tool to assess the vestibular function. Bone conduction (BC) mVEMP assesses vestibular function in individuals with conductive hearing loss having a significant air-bone gap (ABG). Hence, it is essential to establish a comparative normal range of values for air conduction (AC) and BC mVEMP. Aim of the study The study aimed to evaluate the vestibulomasseteric reflex pathway using AC and BC mVEMP for click and 500 Hz tone burst stimuli in neurotypical young adults and compare it to individuals with conductive hearing loss. Method Ten neurotypical (20 ears) young adults and five (10 ears) individuals with conductive hearing loss in the age range of 15-40 years without vestibular complaints were recruited for the study. The AC and BC mVEMP were recorded monaurally using click and 500 Hz tone burst stimuli for all the participants. Results For neurotypical young adults, the mean latencies of P1 and N1 for AC and BC mVEMP using click were 13.87±1.86 ms and 19.78±2.14 ms and 13.79±2.06 ms and 21.30±1.48 ms, respectively. The P1 and N1 mean latencies for AC and BC mVEMP using 500 Hz tone burst were 14.90±1.50 ms and 21.03±1.30 ms and 14.18±0.95 ms and 19.75±1.71 ms, respectively. For individuals with conductive hearing loss, the P1 and N1 mean latencies for AC and BC mVEMP using click were 15.37±1.46 ms and 20.65±2.65 ms and 15.41±0.68 ms and 21.07±1.45 ms, respectively. AC mVEMP responses were absent for 500 Hz tone burst stimuli. The P1 and N1 mean latencies for BC mVEMP using 500 Hz tone burst stimuli were 14.96±0.6 ms and 22.72±1.42 ms, respectively. Conclusion AC mVEMP was absent for 500 Hz tone burst stimulus but present for click stimulus in individuals with conductive hearing loss as there was a larger ABG at the low frequencies than at the mid-high frequencies. BC mVEMP was present for click and 500 Hz tone burst stimuli in all individuals with conductive hearing loss and latencies of P1 and N1 were similar to results obtained for neurotypical young adults and no significant difference was seen.

Indexed as

ac vempbc vempconductive hearing lossmasseter musclemvempvestibulomasseteric reflex pathway

Identifiers

PMID39463641
PMCPMC11512666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.