ArticleCureus2024
Perioperative Hypothermia in Surgical Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis at a Busy District General Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Perioperative hypothermia is a common yet underreported complication of surgery. It results from various factors, including cold operating theaters, anesthetic effects, environmental exposure, exposed tissues, and the administration of cold intravenous or irrigation fluids. This study aims to determine the incidence of perioperative hypothermia in a district National Health Service hospital to assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) for interventions to prevent hypothermia. Methods This retrospective study included the data of 200 elective surgical patients at North Manchester General Hospital from June 1, 2022, to August 1, 2022. Inclusion criteria were elective general surgery, urology, breast, and gynecology patients aged 18 to 60 years. Exclusion criteria included emergency cases and patients younger than 18 or older than 60. Temperature measurement data were collected from the anesthesia records of the patients at six phases: preoperative, pre-induction, intraoperative, post-procedure, recovery room, and post-recovery. Data collection included specialty, surgery duration, and the use of intraoperative fluid warmers. Statistical analysis was performed using StatsDirect software (StatsDirect Ltd, Wirral, UK). Results Among the 200 patients, the overall incidence of hypothermia was 4% preoperatively, 5% pre-induction, 12% intraoperatively, 11% postoperatively, 8% in recovery, and 6% post-recovery. Intraoperative hypothermia incidence was significant, given that active warming was applied to patients with preoperative hypothermia. Regression analysis showed no correlation between intraoperative temperature and the use of intraoperative fluid warmers. Pre-induction temperature was the most statistically significant predictor of intraoperative hypothermia. Conclusions This study highlights the need for active interventions to recognize and prevent perioperative hypothermia in elective surgical patients. Active pre-warming of patients, regardless of surgery type and duration, is feasible and potentially beneficial. Future research should include an RCT comparing active and passive warming strategies to evaluate their effectiveness in improving perioperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.