ReviewCureus2024
Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Crohn's Disease: An Updated Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and tolerability of janus kinase inhibition strategies for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease: A systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that significantly impacts patient quality of life. This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, in the treatment of CD. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, yielding seven studies published between 2020 and 2024, encompassing 1,481 patients. The review includes randomized controlled trials, post hoc analyses of phase 3 trials, and observational studies. Findings consistently demonstrate upadacitinib's superiority over placebo in inducing and maintaining clinical remission, achieving endoscopic response, and normalizing inflammatory markers. Notably, upadacitinib showed rapid symptom relief, with clinical remission observed as early as five to six days after treatment initiation. Efficacy was observed across various patient populations, including those with prior biologic failure. Long-term studies indicated sustained clinical and endoscopic improvements, with remission rates maintained for up to 30 months. Upadacitinib also demonstrated effectiveness in real-world, treatment-refractory cohorts. Safety profiles were generally consistent with those of other JAK inhibitors. Common adverse events included infections, particularly herpes zoster, and laboratory abnormalities such as neutropenia and elevated creatine kinase. Serious adverse events were infrequent, although careful monitoring is warranted. This review suggests that upadacitinib is a promising treatment option for moderate to severe CD, offering rapid and sustained efficacy with an acceptable safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.