ArticleCureus2024
Ethical Considerations in the Management of Orthopedic Surgery Waste: Balancing Environmental Protection and Participant Safety.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Second Chances: A Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Survey and Review of Current Practices and Attitudes Toward the Reuse of Deep Orthopaedic Implants.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Article
- Towards sustainable healthcare in otorhinolaryngology: assessing knowledge, engagement, and opportunities for change.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Climate change and environmental sustainability in emergency medicine: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The healthcare sector significantly contributes to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with orthopedic surgery generating substantial waste, including single-use devices and hazardous materials. These practices exacerbate climate change and environmental degradation. This article explores the environmental and ethical implications of waste management in orthopedic surgery, focusing on the need for sustainable practices. Key approaches include recycling and reusing materials, implementing closed-loop supply chains, and promoting sustainable procurement. Case studies from various countries, such as Asia (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh), Africa, and Latin America, highlight the challenges and progress in managing medical waste, emphasizing the substantial potential for recycling preoperative waste. Ethical considerations revolve around ensuring safe waste handling to protect healthcare workers, patients, and communities while maintaining high standards of care. This should be done as per infection control and biomedical waste protocols. National and international ethical guidelines extend their discussion to the principles of biomedical and health ethics (autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice), especially regarding informed consent and the reuse of medical devices. Patients should be fully informed about environmental and waste management practices, with an emphasis on transparency and voluntary participation. The reuse of external fixators, while cost-effective, raises questions about ownership, safety, and cost transparency. The article underscores the importance of adopting eco-friendly practices and green technologies in healthcare to mitigate the sector's carbon footprint. Initiatives such as energy-efficient buildings, renewable energy sources, and comprehensive recycling programs are vital. The conclusion calls for regulatory bodies and healthcare organizations to enforce guidelines for ethical waste management, balancing cost-effective practices with patient autonomy and environmental responsibility. Ethical waste management in orthopedic surgery is crucial for protecting the environment and the service providers and ensuring the well-being of all stakeholders involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.