ArticleCureus2024
Gastrointestinal Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-analysis and external validation of a risk model for gastrointestinal bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention.BMC medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a well-established method for treating coronary artery disease. However, stent implantation necessitates the use of antiplatelet agents, which increases the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). This study aims to assess the incidence, etiology, and outcomes of GIB within one year post-PCI at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH), Muscat, Oman.
methodsThis retrospective analysis included 435 patients who underwent PCI at SQUH between January and December 2017, excluding those with multiple PCI procedures and incomplete data. GIB was defined using the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (timi) bleeding score. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) with binary logistic regression employed to identify significant risk factors for GIB. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsGIB was identified in 15 patients (age 67.8 ± 8.8 years; 60% male), resulting in an incidence within one year post-PCI of 3.4%. Melena (53.3%) and hematemesis (20.0%) were the most frequent clinical presentations, with peptic ulcer disease being the predominant underlying etiology (40%). Significant risk factors included advanced age, chronic kidney disease, pre-existing peptic ulcer disease, and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
conclusionsThe incidence of GIB observed in this study aligns with previously reported rates. These findings highlight the importance of pre-PCI risk stratification for bleeding, especially in high-risk patients. Prophylactic measures, such as the use of gastric protective agents, should be considered to mitigate the risk of GIB in patients undergoing PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.