ArticleCureus2024
The Performance of a Customized Generative Pre-trained Transformer on the American Society for Surgery of the Hand Self-Assessment Examination.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language models in medical education: a comparative cross-platform evaluation in answering histological questions.Medical education online · 2025Article
- Comparison of hand surgery certification exams in Europe and the United States using ChatGPT 4.0.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMultimodal large language models (MLLMs), such as OpenAI's ChatGPT (San Francisco, CA), have the potential to improve medical care delivery and education, although important shortcomings in accuracy and image interpretation have been noted. The aim of this study was to assess the multimodal performance of a ChatGPT model customized with hand surgery-specific knowledge.
methodsA customized generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) was trained using peer-reviewed literature recommended by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH). Questions were taken from the ASSH 2022 Self-Assessment Examination (SAE). GPT-4 and the customized GPT were asked text-based multiple-choice questions. The customized GPT was also asked image-containing questions, both with and without access to the image(s) associated with each question.
resultsA total of 192 questions were included. The customized GPT responded to the 119 text-only questions with greater accuracy than GPT-4 (107 (89.9%) versus 91 (76.5%), P = 0.001). Human examinees answered 87.3% (IQR: 71.6-93.7%) of the same text-based questions correctly. Of the 73 questions with images, the customized GPT answered 55 (75.3%) questions correctly, which dropped to 51 (69.9%) when the images were withheld (P = 0.317). The human examinees answered 87.2% (IQR: 79.4-95.4%) of image-based questions correctly.
conclusionOur findings suggest significant improvements in ChatGPT's ability to answer text-based hand surgery questions with hand-specific training. ChatGPT is still limited in its ability to interpret images to answer questions related to hand conditions. These data show hand surgeons can create customized GPT models to provide tailored answers to specific questions, which may serve as the foundation for educational and clinical tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.