Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39463610›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Classifying Learning Speed Using Brain Networks and Psychological States: Unraveling the Interdependence Between Learning Performance, Psychological States, and Brain Functions.

Hiroki Bizen, Daisuke Kimura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hiroki BizenDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kansai University of Health Sciences, Osaka, JPN.
Daisuke KimuraDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Nagoya Women's University, Nagoya, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The progression of performance learning (PL) may have complex relationships beyond mere concurrent occurrences and may influence each other. This study aimed to classify the speed of PL using a random forest based on brain network and stress state information and to identify the factors necessary for PL. In addition, this study also aimed to clarify the complex interdependent relationships between PL, psychological state, and brain function through these factors, using covariance structure analysis. Methods A total of 20 healthy individuals participated in a choice reaction time task, and brain function was measured using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Participants were divided into high-PL and low-PL groups based on the median difference in correct responses. Results Random forest analysis identified the left orbitofrontal area, right premotor cortex, right frontal pole, left frontal pole, left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and depression and anxiety as key factors. Covariance structure analysis revealed that depression and anxiety affected PL through the frontal pole and prefrontal cortex, suggesting a complex interplay between psychological state, brain function, and learning. Conclusions These findings suggest that psychological states influence brain networks, thereby affecting learning performance. Tailoring rehabilitation programs to address psychological states and providing targeted feedback may improve learning outcomes. The study provides insights into the theoretical and practical applications of understanding the brain's role in PL, as well as the importance of addressing psychological factors to optimize learning and rehabilitation strategies.

Indexed as

brain networknear-infrared spectroscopyperformance learningpsychological staterehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39463610
PMCPMC11506145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.