Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39463598›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Drug Interactions Between Traveler's Diarrhea Medications and Chronic Therapies: Implications for Clinical Practice.

Swetha B, Rajappan Chandra Satish Kumar, Mothishwaran B, Kripa Shankar C K

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Swetha BDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, IND.
Rajappan Chandra Satish KumarClinical Trial and Research Unit, Interdisciplinary Institute of Indian System of Medicine, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, IND.
Mothishwaran BClinical Trial and Research Unit, Interdisciplinary Institute of Indian System of Medicine, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, IND.
Kripa Shankar C KClinical Trial and Research Unit, Interdisciplinary Institute of Indian System of Medicine, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diarrhea is a common illness for travelers. Traveler's diarrhea is typically defined as experiencing at least three unformed stools per day during a stay abroad or within 10 days of returning from the destination. In this review, we consulted five databases, namely, Medicine Complete, Medscape, Drugs.com, Epocrates, and DDInter, to conduct a comprehensive drug interaction analysis. We selected commonly prescribed medications used for the treatment of traveler's diarrhea, including ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, azithromycin, rifaximin, bismuth salicylate, and loperamide. The antidiabetic medications chosen included metformin, glipizide, glimepiride, sitagliptin, linagliptin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and acarbose. The chosen antihypertensive drugs were telmisartan, olmesartan, amlodipine, nifedipine, enalapril, ramipril, metoprolol, and propranolol. Aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, rivaroxaban, warfarin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin were also chosen as they play an essential role in cardiovascular treatment. We performed comprehensive interaction checks across all five databases for each combination of a traveler's diarrhea medication and medication from one of the three comorbid conditions (antidiabetic, antihypertensive, or cardioprotective). We categorized the severity of interactions as mild, moderate, or severe. Similarly, we used colors to highlight the number of databases reporting drug interactions, providing insights into the reliability of these interactions across sources. Interactions with antidiabetic drugs revealed that fluoroquinolones and sulfonylureas produce severe interaction effects. Comparatively, rifaximin can be safer as it exhibited mild interaction only with metformin, whereas the other antidiabetic drugs showed no interaction effect. Levofloxacin was found to be the safest drug among hypertensive individuals as it exerted no interaction effects with any of the antihypertensive medications. Levofloxacin and rifaximin were considered to be safe as these drugs interacted with only two cardioprotective drugs. This review features the importance of a precise approach in prescribing medications for traveler's diarrhea, especially for patients with chronic comorbidities. These findings play a pivotal role in improving awareness and providing tailored treatment for the interaction to ensure patient well-being.

Indexed as

antidiabeticantihypertensivecardioprotectivedrug interactiontraveler’s diarrhea

Identifiers

PMID39463598
PMCPMC11512002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.