Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39463472›Full record

ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2024

Comparing Cancer Primary and Secondary Prevention Documentation Between Different Digital Health Approaches in the Emergency Department.

Sally K Stauder, Shalmali R Borkar, Anna Najor, Adrienne Hunter, Christopher DeStephano, Michael Mohseni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sally K StauderFlorida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4378-3688
Shalmali R BorkarRobert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Anna NajorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.
Adrienne HunterDepartment of Medical and Surgical Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Christopher DeStephanoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7753-3599
Michael MohseniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Decreasing primary care access and increasing emergency department (ED) usage is a potential contributor to declining cancer screening prevalences in those facing barriers to health care access. The ED is a non-traditional yet potentially high-yield setting for implementation of interventions to monitor and increase cancer screening. Methods: An ED-administered survey in July 2022 gathered data on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening, as well as human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination status of females presenting to the ED for care. This was compared with electronic health record (EHR) data extraction of all ED patients during the same timeframe. Primary outcome was proportion of cancer screening and HPV vaccination not up to date in each group. Results: ED survey was administered to 101 individuals; EHR data was extracted on 2934 patients. Survey versus EHR, respectively, found cervical cancer screening was not up to date in 6.2% vs. 77.6%, breast cancer screening in 14.3% vs. 73.4%, colorectal cancer screening in 22.9% vs. 56.5%, and HPV vaccination in 33.3% vs. 57.8%. Discussion: Our data indicate significant discrepancies between self-reported screening history and EHR data. ED survey results were more in line with the observed screening rates in various surveillance systems and published in the literature. This suggests that point-of-care ED survey administration may be more effective in identifying those needing preventative cancer screening, especially in individuals with less access to routine health care.

Indexed as

cancerclinical information systemselectronic health records and systemsemergency medicineobstetrics/gynecologypreventive medicine

Identifiers

PMID39463472
PMCPMC11512083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.