ArticleScientific reports2024
Selection of optimal spectral features for leaf chlorophyll content estimation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is crucial for monitoring the physiological processes of crops. Many studies have utilized spectral features to develop regression models for accurate LCC estimation, enabling the quantitative assessment and evaluation of crop growth status. The selection of optimal spectral features and regression algorithms significantly affects the precision of LCC estimation. In this study, we compared and analyzed the optimal spectral features for LCC estimation, as well as the consistency of machine learning methods across different crop types, phenology periods, and sensors. First, we extracted various spectral features, including the original spectral features (OS), first-order derivative spectral features (FDS), original continuum-removed spectra (CR) along with their four related derivative spectral features, principal component variables derived from different spectral features, and highly correlated spectral features with LCC. These extracted spectral features were then employed to construct the LCC models using six common regression algorithms on different datasets. Finally, we analyzed the optimal combination of spectral features and regression algorithms for accurate LCC estimation considering various dimensions, such as crop type, phenological period, and sensor used in observation conditions. The results demonstrate that the combinations of the principal component variables of continuum-removed derivative reflectance with the top 10 correlations with LCC (PCA_CRDR_R) combined with Gaussian process regression (GPR) can be considered as the optimal choice for estimating LCC under diverse observation conditions at a canopy scale, and its R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.