Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39463194›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2024

Ex-vivo evaluation of clinically-set hydraulic sealers used with different canal dryness protocols and obturation techniques: a randomized clinical trial.

Nawar Naguib Nawar, Mohamed Mohamed Elashiry, Ahmed El Banna, Shehabeldin Mohamed Saber, Edgar Schäfer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05808062 (The Effect of Different Canal Dryness Protocols on the Quality of Matched Single Cone Obturation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05808062 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Different Canal Dryness Protocols on the Quality of Matched Single Cone Obturation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBritish University In EgyptRan2022 to 2022Enrolled24ConditionsObturationArmsRoot canal obturation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nawar Naguib NawarDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The British University in Egypt (BUE), 24 Hasan Elgamal street El Sherouk City, Nasr City, Cairo, 11837, Egypt. Nawar.Naguib@bue.edu.eg.ORCID 0000-0002-0870-9976
Mohamed Mohamed ElashiryDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-0880-4882
Ahmed El BannaDepartment of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-6438-1813
Shehabeldin Mohamed SaberDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The British University in Egypt (BUE), 24 Hasan Elgamal street El Sherouk City, Nasr City, Cairo, 11837, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-1465-3198
Edgar SchäferCentral Interdisciplinary Ambulance in the School of Dentistry, University of Münster, Waldeyerstr. 30, D-48149, Münster, Germany. eschaef@uni-muenster.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4443-2345

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis 2-part randomized parallel triple-blind clinical trial adopts a unique model assessing clinically-set hydraulic calcium silicate-based sealers (HCSBS) after different root canal dryness protocols and obturation techniques.

methodsFor the first phase of the study, 24 teeth scheduled for orthodontic extractions were allocated into four groups according to the canal dryness protocol and the obturation technique. G1 (CLC-AHP): cold lateral compaction (CLC) with AH Plus sealer, G2 (CLC-ES-SD): CLC with Endosequence (ES) after standard canal(s) dryness (SD); G3 (SC-ES-SD): matching single-cone (SC) with ES after SD; G4 (SC-ES-PD): as G3 but after partial canal(s) dryness (PD). Teeth were extracted after one month of clinical service and examined for intracanal voids by micro-CT (2D & 3D). For the 2nd phase, another 24 teeth were allocated into four groups according to the root canal dryness protocol and the HCSBS used (ES or CeraSeal (CeS)). Teeth were extracted after one month and sectioned vertically for energy dispersive X-ray (EDX)/scanning electron microscope (SEM) examination. One-way ANOVA with Games-Howell post-hoc test and Chi-square test with multiple z-tests were used for statistical analysis.

resultsSC-PD showed the highest percentage of voids (p < 0.05). MicroCT scans as well as EDX/SEM examination showed that PD resulted in significantly larger interfacial gaps (p < 0.001) with more hydration products at the sealer/dentin interface than SD.

conclusionsBoth tested dryness protocols allowed the hydration of HCSBS and the formation of hydration products, thus standard dryness is recommended to reduce the incidence of intracanal voids. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When using the single-cone obturation technique, intentional root canal moisture negatively affects the performance of HCSBS. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, ID: NCT05808062.

Indexed as

Calcium CompoundsEpoxy ResinsRoot Canal Filling MaterialsRoot Canal ObturationSilicatesX-Ray MicrotomographyCalcium PhosphatesDrug CombinationsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningOxidesSurface PropertiesCalcium CompoundsCalcium Phosphatescalcium silicateDrug CombinationsEndoSequence root repair materialepoxy resin-based root canal sealerEpoxy ResinsOxidesRoot Canal Filling MaterialsSilicatesBioceramic sealersHydrationHydraulic sealersIntracanal moistureIntracanal voidsObturationSingle cone

Identifiers

PMID39463194
PMCPMC11513728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.