ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2024
Multilayered Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique in Optic Disc Pit Maculopathy.
Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of inverted internal limiting membrane flap for treating optic disc pit maculopathy.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Autologous Tenon's Capsule Graft for Recurrent Retinal Detachment Associated with a Cavitary Optic Disc Anomaly following Failed Amniotic Membrane Grafting.Journal of current ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the anatomical and visual outcomes of the multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane (ML-ILM) flap technique in the treatment of optic disc pit maculopathy (ODPM). Materials and Methods: In this retrospective interventional case series, medical records and macular spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images of patients who underwent combined pars plana vitrectomy with ML-ILM flap surgery for ODPM were analyzed. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) at postoperative 6 months were compared with baseline findings. Intraoperative and postoperative complications, fluid resolution time, and recurrence during follow-up were recorded. Results: Five eyes of 5 patients with ODPM were included in the study. According to the preoperative macular fluid characteristics, 2 patients had only intraretinal fluid, while 3 patients had intraretinal and subretinal fluid. The preoperative median BCVA was 1.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (range, 1.0-1.3 logMAR), and the CMT was 560 μm (range, 452-667 μm). At the 6-month postoperative follow-up, the median BCVA was 0.40 logMAR (range, 0.1-0.7 logMAR), and CMT was 315 μm (range, 265-326 μm) (p=0.042 and p=0.043, respectively). During the 6-month follow-up period, no recurrence or full-thickness macular hole formation was observed. Conclusion: The ML-ILM flap technique is a preferable surgical option to achieve both high anatomical and functional success and flap stabilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.