ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2024
Evaluation of Medically Reversible Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.
Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ocular Surface Inflammation as a Driver of Cornea Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency: Mechanisms and Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis simulating total limbal stem cell deficiency: a case report.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Different Surgical Techniques in Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Letter to the Editor Re: Evaluation of Medically Reversible Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Reply.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment strategies of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) patients managed with medical therapy. Materials and Methods: The study included 29 eyes of 21 patients with LSCD who were managed medically at Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology between May 2013 and May 2023. LSCD stages before and after medical treatment were recorded according to the LSCD staging system published by the International LSCD Working Group. The medical records of patients showing improvement in LSCD stage with medical treatment without surgical intervention were evaluated. Results: The mean age was 35.5±23.8 years (range, 5-71 years) with a male-to-female ratio of 6:15. The primary etiology of LSCD was ocular rosacea in 12 patients (57.1%), marginal keratitis in the setting of blepharitis in 8 patients (38.1%), and topical medication toxicity in 1 patient (4.8%). The mean baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.25±0.26 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (range, 0-1 logMAR). Pre-treatment LSCD stage was stage 1A in 5 eyes (17.2%), stage 1B in 12 eyes (41.4%), stage 1C in 4 eyes (13.8%), stage 2A in 4 eyes (13.8%), and stage 2B in 4 eyes (13.8%). Complete regression of LSCD was achieved in 6 eyes (20.7%) with medical treatment addressing the primary etiology. In the remaining eyes, after medical treatment, the severity of LSCD decreased below the surgical threshold, which is considered stage 2B. The mean final BCVA was 0.07±0.1 logMAR (range, 0-0.4 logMAR). Conclusion: This study highlights that LSCD can be completely or partially reversible with appropriate management, especially in cases with underlying limbal niche dysfunction, where inflammation plays a significant role. Although limbal stem cell transplantation is considered the main treatment approach for LSCD, localized and early-stage LSCD can be effectively managed medically without the need for surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.