Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39462976›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025

Applying theories, models, and frameworks to help genetic counselors and students achieve clinical and professional goals.

Deborah Cragun, Lindsey Victoria, Angela R Bradbury, Marleah Dean, Jada G Hamilton, Mira L Katz, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Jennifer W Mack, Ken Resnicow, Kimberly A Kaphingst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Deborah CragunCollege of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3620-2857
Lindsey VictoriaLabcorp Women's Health and Genetics, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Angela R BradburyAbramson Cancer Center and Division of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Marleah DeanDepartment of Communication, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Jada G HamiltonDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Mira L KatzDivision of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Alanna Kulchak RahmDepartment of Genomic Health, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jennifer W MackDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ken ResnicowUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Kimberly A KaphingstDepartment of Communication and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Eric R. Fearon · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Leveraging an electronic medical record infrastructure to identify primary care patients eligible for genetic testing for hereditary cancer and evaluate novel cancer genetics service delivery modelsU01CA232826 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KAPHINGST, KIMBERLY A, SIGIREDDI, MEENAKSHI · 2018 to 2022
$5.5M
IMProving Care After Inherited Cancer Testing (IMPACT) StudyU01CA254832 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CRAGUN, DEBORAH LE, PAL, TUYA · 2020 to 2024
$4.0M
Innovative Approaches to Expand Cancer Genetic Screening and Testing for Patients & Families in a Statewide Oncology Network through Community, State, & Payer PartnershipsU01CA232827 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GRIGGS, JENNIFER J, RESNICOW, KEN A. · 2020 to 2020
$4.0M
A Randomized Hybrid Type I effectiveness-implementation study of an Ehealth delivery Alternative for Cancer genetic testing for Hereditary cancer predisposition (eREACH)U01CA243702 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BRADBURY, ANGELA R. · 2020 to 2024
$3.9M
Implementing Universal Lynch Syndrome Screening across Multiple Healthcare Systems: Identifying Strategies to Facilitate and Maintain Programs in Different Organizational ContextsR01CA211723 · NCI · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI RAHM, ALANNA K · 2017 to 2021
$3.7M
The IMproving Access to Genetic INformation for Everyone (IMAGINE) Study: A Prospective Trial of a Mainstreaming Model for Hereditary Cancer Multigene Panel Testing Among Cancer PatientsU01CA243644 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI HAMILTON, JADA GABRIELLE · 2020 to 2025
$3.7M
The AYA-RISE Intervention: Risk Information and Screening Education for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer Predisposition SyndromesU01CA243688 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI MACK, JENNIFER W · 2019 to 2019
$3.5M
Feasibility and Assessment of a Cascade Traceback Screening program - FACTSU01CA240747 · NCI · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI BUCHANAN, ADAM H, HENRIKSON, NORA B. · 2020 to 2023
$2.9M
A Randomized Controlled Trial: Genetic Counseling Patient Preference Intervention via Electronic Health Record Portal vs. Conventional Genetic Counseling for Women at Elevated Risk for Breast CancerR01CA248739 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KATZ, MIRA L, SWEET, KEVIN M. · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute CCSG 5-P30-CA-046592-32-S3Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute NCI P30 CA008748Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute R01CA211723Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute U01CA232826Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute U01CA232827Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute U01CA240747Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute U01CA243644Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute U01CA243688 R01CA248739Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute U01CA254832NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS R01 CA211723NCI NIH HHS R01 CA248739NCI NIH HHS U01 CA232826NCI NIH HHS U01 CA232827NCI NIH HHS U01 CA240747NCI NIH HHS U01 CA243644NCI NIH HHS U01 CA243702NCI NIH HHS U01 CA254832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some genetic counselors (GCs) may find theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) useful in clinical skills selection and when reflecting on or evaluating genetic counseling practice. This paper aims to demonstrate how TMFs can be used to postulate how different skills may impact patients'/clients' decisions, behaviors, and outcomes and consider how multiple TMFs can inform the use of various skills or strategies to achieve different goals. Additionally, we provide examples of TMFs that may help GCs in nonclinical aspects of their work, such as implementing and evaluating new interventions or service delivery models. To guide the selection of appropriate TMFs, we provide a set of questions to consider and include examples of skills and approaches that align with different TMFs. While TMFs provide a structured approach and valuable guidance that may help advance genetic counseling practice, they have certain limitations. Additional research is necessary to determine the effectiveness of using TMFs to guide clinical practice and improve patient/client outcomes.

Indexed as

CounselorsGenetic CounselingGoalsModels, TheoreticalHumanscommunicationgenetic counselingoutcomesskillsstrategies

Identifiers

PMID39462976
PMCPMC12257566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.