ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2024
On the interpretability of the SVM model for predicting infant mortality in Bangladesh.
Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and internal validation of an XGBoost-based prognostic prediction model and risk stratification system for overall survival in pediatric neuroblastoma: a SEER-based study.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- An explainable machine learning model for predicting high phosphorus risk in patients on maintenance hemodialysis: a multicenter retrospective study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- An explainable machine learning framework for analyzing and predicting mental health problems among university students in Bangladesh.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparison of the predictive power of novel insulin resistance, lipid metabolism and obesity indices for the risk of developing dyslipidaemia in adults.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
- Advances in surrogate modeling for biological agent-based simulations: trends, challenges, and future prospects.Journal of mathematical biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough machine learning (ML) models are well-liked for their outperformance in prediction, greatly avoided due to the lack of intuition and explanation of their predictions. Interpretable ML is, therefore, an emerging research field that combines the performance and interpretability of ML models to create comprehensive solutions for complex decision-making analysis. Conversely, infant mortality is a global public health concern affecting health, social well-being, socio-economic development, and healthcare services. The study employs advanced interpretable ML techniques to anticipate and understand the factors affecting infant mortality in Bangladesh, overcoming the shortcomings of the conventional logistic regression (LR) model.
methodsBy utilizing the global surrogate model and local individual conditional expectation (ICE) interpretability technique, the interpretable support vector machine (SVM) has been used in this study to reveal significant characteristics of infant mortality using data from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2017-18. To investigate intricate decision-making analysis of infant mortality, we adapted SVM and LR techniques with the hyperparameter tuning parameters. These models' performances were initially assessed using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, run-time, and confusion matrix parameters with 100 permutations. Afterward, the SVM model's model-agnostic explanation and the LR model's interpretation were compared to enhance advanced comprehension for further insights.
resultsThe results of the 100 permutations demonstrated that the LR model (Average: accuracy = 0.9105, precision = NaN, sensitivity = 0, specificity = 1, F1-score = 0, area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.6780, run-time = 0.0832) outperformed the SVM model (Average: accuracy = 0.8470, precision = 0.1062, sensitivity = 0.0949, specificity = 0.9209, F1-score = 0.1000, AUC = 0.5632, run-time = 0.0254) in predicting infant mortality, but the LR model had a slower run-time and it was unable to predict any positive cases. The interpretation of LR analysis revealed that infant mortality rates decrease when mothers give birth after over two years, with higher educational attainment, overweight or obese mothers, working mothers, and families with polluted cooking fuel having lower rates. The local ICE interpretability technique, which depicts individual influences on the average likelihood of dying within the first birthday, explores the interpretable SVM model that mothers with normal BMIs, giving birth within two years, using less polluted cooking fuel, working mothers, and having male infant were more likely to experience infant death. The interpretable SVM model based on the global surrogate model also reveals that working mothers who used polluted cooking fuel at home and working women who used less polluted cooking fuel but had a longer period between pregnancies than two years would have higher infant death rates. Even among non-working mothers who used polluted cooking fuel and gave birth within two years of the preceding one, infant death rates were higher.
conclusionsThe interpretable SVM model reveals global interpretations help clinicians understand the entire conditional distribution, while local interpretations focus on specific instances, providing different insights into model behavior. Interpretable ML models aid policymakers, stakeholders, and families in understanding and preventing infant deaths by improving policy-making strategies and establishing effective family counseling services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.