Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39462420›Full record

ArticleHead & face medicine2024

Patient self rated pain: headache versus migraine a retrospective chart review.

Elizabeth Toigo, Erin Pellot, Hannah Lyons, Peter McAllister, Martin Taylor

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Head & face medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth Toigo, 191 W Union St, Athens, OH, 45701, USA.
Erin Pellot, 191 W Union St, Athens, OH, 45701, USA. eepellot@gmail.com.
Hannah Lyons, 191 W Union St, Athens, OH, 45701, USA.
Peter McAllisterNew England Institute for Neurology and Headache, 30 Buxton Farm Rd # 230, Stamford, CT, 06905, USA.
Martin TaylorOrthoNeuro, 5040 Forest Dr #300, New Albany, OH, 43054, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3) uses moderate or severe pain intensity in the diagnostic criterion for migraine. However, few studies have analyzed pain rating on a visual analog scale to identify the numerical intensity that correlates with migraine.

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of daily self-rated headache pain among patients with either episodic or chronic migraine. This study specifically aims to evaluate the probability of patients labeling their head pain as a headache vs. migraine based on the pain level reported.

methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with a clinical diagnosis of migraine from July 1, 2014, to July 1, 2019.

resultsData of 114 subjects (57 episodic migraine and 57 chronic migraine) were used for analysis. Patients with episodic migraine on average rated a migraine more severe than a headache (4.1 vs. 6.4; p < 0.001). Patients with chronic migraine on average also rated migraine more severe than a headache (4.3 vs. 6.8; p = 0.0054). Chronic migraine patients transitioned from calling head pain a headache to a migraine significantly later than episodic migraine patients (4.5 vs. 6.8; p < 0.05).

conclusionA migraine is perceived as having higher pain intensity than a headache in patients with both episodic and chronic migraine. On average, patients with chronic migraine had a higher pain rating at which they report head pain to be considered a migraine.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersPain MeasurementAdultFemaleHeadacheHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSelf ReportChronic migraineEpisodic migraineHeadachePain reliefVisual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID39462420
PMCPMC11515190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.