ArticleLipids in health and disease2024
Construction and validation of a line chart for gestational diabetes mellitus based on clinical indicators.
Article in Lipids in health and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and Validation of Key Genes Related to Arginine Methylation Modification in Sepsis Using Transcriptome Combined with Mendelian Randomization Analysis.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Article
- C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index (CTI) as a predictor of chronic liver disease in adults with macrocytic anemia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a multidimensional indicator-based risk prediction model for gestational diabetes mellitus: a nested case-control study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
- Article
- Integrative single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing unravels the role of ACTN1 in promoting lung cancer with brain metastasis and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication of mid-to-late pregnancy. Here, we constructed a predictive model for GDM based on a combination of clinical characteristics and relevant serum markers.
methodsData from full-term singleton vaginal deliveries from January 2022 to January 2023 were retrospectively collected from the obstetrics department. The data collected were segregated and assigned to training, validation, and external test sets. Maternal demographic characteristics, living and working habits, and haematological indicators, such as liver function and lipids were collected using a questionnaire designed for the study. The "rms" package in R was used to explore GDM-associated factors through stepwise regression at P < 0.05. A predictive model was developed based on the results of multifactorial logistic regression analysis. We then evaluated the differentiation of the column-line graphical model and performed internal and external validation. To assess the accuracy of the bar graphical model, we plotted calibration and decision curves.
resultsData from 265 pregnant women were included in the training and internal validation sets, and data from 113 pregnant women were included in the external validation set. The logistic regression algorithm screened 8 indicators as predictors. A prediction model was constructed with ALT, TBA, TC, and TG levels while considering whether GDM affects appetite, the husband- wife relationship, family history, and parental relationships as predictors. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test revealed that the chi-square values for the modelling, internal validation, and external validation groups (χ
conclusionIn this study, a GDM prediction model was constructed to achieve high performance in GDM risk prediction based on routine obstetric tests and information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.