Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39462399›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2024

Addressing integration in the organization of palliative care in belgium: a multilevel ecosystems approach using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method.

Melissa De Regge, Paul Gemmel, Leen Ackaert, Let Dillen, Peter Pype, Nele Van Den Noortgate, Bert Meijboom, Kristof Eeckloo

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melissa De Regge *Department of Marketing, Innovation and Organization, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Tweekerkenstraat 2, Ghent, B-9000, Belgium. Melissa.deregge@ugent.be.
Paul Gemmel *Department of Marketing, Innovation and Organization, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Tweekerkenstraat 2, Ghent, B-9000, Belgium.
Leen AckaertDepartment of Marketing, Innovation and Organization, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Tweekerkenstraat 2, Ghent, B-9000, Belgium.
Let DillenDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Ghent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, B-9000, Belgium.
Peter PypeDepartement of Public Health and Primary Care Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Care, University of Ghent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, B-9000, Belgium.
Nele Van Den NoortgateDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Ghent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, B-9000, Belgium.
Bert MeijboomDepartment Tranzo, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, Tilburg, 5037 AB, The Netherlands.
Kristof EecklooStrategic Policy Unit, University Hospital Ghent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, B-9000, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliative care is becoming an essential component of healthcare, but there is insufficient research on how integration across different levels of care (micro, meso, and macro) is realized in practice. Without such integration, care may become fragmented, leading to suboptimal patient outcomes. While many studies have explored palliative care models, there is a gap in understanding how priorities for integrated care align across these levels within healthcare ecosystems. Specifically, it is unclear whether key actions at each level are shared, coordinated, and supported effectively, making it difficult to implement sustainable, cohesive care strategies. Our study aims to explore the extent to which important goals (i.e., priorities) are shared across the micro, meso, and macro levels of the palliative care ecosystem in Flanders, Belgium.

methodsWe applied a multimethod study using the analytic hierarchy process method (AHP). This consists of three sequential steps: a broad literature search and interviews with Belgian stakeholders (n = 12) to determine the criteria for the organization of integrated care; focus groups (n = 8) with patients, their relatives and caregivers to establish the completeness and relevance of the criteria; and prioritization of the criteria using a questionnaire among 305 Flemish participants (patients, relatives, caregivers and policy makers).

resultsOur findings revealed that integration is imbalanced, with priorities being most emphasized at the micro level (57%), followed by the meso (29%) and macro (14%) level. Functional enablers dominate at the macro (80%) and meso organizational level (67%), while normative enablers are emphasized at the meso professional (67%) and micro level (75%). Effective palliative care requires vertical coordination of these enablers: for instance, transparent communication with patients at the micro level depends on cross-organizational information exchange at the meso level, supported by a unified data system at the macro level.

conclusionAchieving integrated palliative care requires deliberate alignment of priorities across all levels of the ecosystem. While each level plays a unique role, palliative care is comprehensive and effective only by sharing both functional and normative enablers across micro, meso, and macro level.

Indexed as

Palliative CareAdultBelgiumDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesAnalytic hierarchy process (AHP) methodEcosystemIntegrated carePalliative care

Identifiers

PMID39462399
PMCPMC11515222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.