Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39462382›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2024

Validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale for the Mental Health Surveillance (MHS) of German adults.

Diana Peitz, Julia Thom, Lena Walther, Heike Hoelling, Caroline Cohrdes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. German adult population norm values of the short Warwick Edinburgh mental well-being scale (SWEMWBS).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Diana PeitzDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany. peitzd@rki.de.
Julia ThomDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Lena WaltherDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Heike HoellingDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Caroline CohrdesDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health encompasses more than just the absence of mental disorders. Thus, a Mental Health Surveillance (MHS) and reporting system for Germany should monitor mental well-being in addition to psychopathology to capture a more complete picture of population mental health. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) is an internationally established inventory for the integrated assessment of different aspects of mental well-being (i.e., hedonic and eudaimonic) in population samples that has not yet been validated for Germany.

methodsUsing data from a cross-sectional online survey of a convenience sample of N = 1.048 adults aged 18-79 years (51% female) living in Germany, the factorial structure, measurement invariance (age, sex) and psychometric properties of the WEMWBS in its long (14 items) and short (7 items) versions were analyzed. Additionally, correlations to relevant factors (e.g., health-related quality of life, psychological distress) were investigated as indicators of criterion validity.

resultsMeans of model fit indices did not confirm a unidimensional factor structure for either version. The three-factor-correlative models showed moderate to good fit while the bifactor model with one general mental well-being factor and three grouping factors fitted the data best. The full range of possible responses was used for all items, and the distribution of both scales was approximately normal. Moreover, the results revealed measurement invariance across sex and age groups. Initial evidence of criterion validity was obtained. Internal consistencies were α = 0.95 and α = 0.89, respectively. Average mental well-being was comparable to that of other European countries at 3.74 for the long version and 3.84 for the short version. While there were no differences by sex, comparisons between age groups revealed higher mental well-being among the older age groups.

conclusionsBoth versions of the WEMWBS showed sound psychometric characteristics in the present German sample. The findings indicate that the instrument is suitable for measuring mental well-being at the population level due to its distributional properties. These results are promising, suggesting that the scale is suitable for use in a national MHS that aims to capture positive mental health in the population as a foundation for prevention and promotion efforts within public mental health.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPsychometricsAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsAdultsMental Health Surveillance (MHS)Mental Well-BeingMonitoringPositive Mental HealthPsychometric PropertiesPublic Mental HealthSurveillanceValidationWEMWBS

Identifiers

PMID39462382
PMCPMC11515111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.