Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39462355›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2024

Validity of specific CPT indices in differentiating school-aged children previously diagnosed with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder from school-aged children with non-attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in general education classrooms: a case control study.

Jeng-Dau Tsai, Han-Yin Sun, Hui-Ying Kuo, Si-Yu Chu, Yu-Wen Lee, Hsin-Hui Lu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cognition in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Obstacles and Challenges?Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeng-Dau TsaiSchool of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Section 1, Jianguo North Road, Taichung, Taiwan.
Han-Yin SunDepartment of Optometry, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Section 1, Jianguo North Road, Taichung, Taiwan.
Hui-Ying KuoDepartment of Optometry, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Section 1, Jianguo North Road, Taichung, Taiwan.
Si-Yu ChuSchool of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Section 1, Jianguo North Road, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yu-Wen LeeSchool of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Section 1, Jianguo North Road, Taichung, Taiwan.
Hsin-Hui LuDivision of Clinical Psychology, Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No.259, Wenhua 1st Rd., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, Taiwan. hsinhuilupsy@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8583-591X

Funding

the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan MOST 108-2410-H-040 -010 -MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuous performance tests (CPTs) are a popular tool for evaluating the symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Performance measurements are typically linked to the biological features and cognitive functions of individuals. To determine the validity of specific CPT indices in differentiating between school-aged children with ADHD from with non-ADHD, each student's sex, chronological age, and cognitive abilities should be considered.

methodsIn this prospective case-control study, a total of 30 non-ADHD students and 26 with ADHD who were aged 6 to 12 years were from general education classrooms. All students completed the Continuous Performance Tests (CPTs) and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-revised (Mandarin-Chinese version). Demographic data were collected from the students' parents.

resultsDetectability, Omissions, Commissions, and Hit Reaction Time Standard Deviation (HRT SD) yielded higher T-scores in children with ADHD than those without. Compared with non-ADHD students, those with ADHD had higher classification scores for Detectability, Omissions, Perseverations, and HRT SD. For each CPT index, after individual factors were controlled for, logistic regression revealed that only students with positive scores for Detectability, Omission, and HRT SD (adjusted odds ratios = 4.627, 9.977, and 3.908, Ps < 0.05) were likely to receive a diagnosis of ADHD. Furthermore, after individual characteristics were controlled for, Logistic regression also revealed that the cumulative positive scores of the Detectability, Omission, or and HRT SD remained associated with an increased risk of ADHD (adjusted odds ratio = 3.116, P < 0.01).

conclusionsCompared with school-aged children with non-ADHD in general education classrooms, those with ADHD exhibited significantly lower performance in inattention-related CPT indices. To reach an accurate diagnosis through CPTs, clinicians should pay attention to Detectability, Omission, and HRT SD. Compared with other CPT indices, Detectability, Omission, and HRT SD may function as more suitable indicators for distinguishing between school-aged children with and non-ADHD in general education classrooms. These indicators are robust and unobscured by individual characteristics.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCase-Control StudiesChildDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsClinical utilityContinuous performance testEmbedded validityGeneral education classroomInattentiveness

Identifiers

PMID39462355
PMCPMC11515130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.