Trial reportBMC geriatrics2024
Impact of telephone coaching supporting a physical maintenance exercise programme for older adults at risk of falls: a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02828826 (Impact of Telephone Coaching on Physical Performance in a Physical Exercise Maintenance Program for Fallers Elderly Patients Living at Home), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Telephone Coaching on Physical Performance in a Physical Exercise Maintenance Program for Fallers Elderly Patients Living at Home
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEncouraging compliance with recommended levels of exercise for older adults is a public health challenge. A minimal-resource solution is telephone coaching.
objectivesPrimary aim: to compare timed up and go (TUG) performance 6 months after beginning a home exercise program between a group of older individuals who received additional telephone coaching, and a control group performing the home exercise program alone. Secondary aims: to compare functional and fall-related outcomes between groups at 6 and 12 months.
methodsMulticentre, assessor-blinded, randomised, controlled, open label, prospective study. Inclusion criteria included age ≥ 65 years, ≥ 1 fall in the past year, and discharged home from hospital rehabilitation or outpatient physiotherapy. All participants received a home exercise booklet and were asked to perform a set of exercises as often as possible (daily). The coaching group additionally received a monthly telephone call (total 5 calls) from their previous physiotherapist. Primary outcome was TUG performance at 6 months. Outcomes were measured at inclusion, and at 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was analysed using a linear mixed model adjusted for the baseline value.
resultsIn total, 99 individuals were included (coaching group n = 50, control group, n = 49; mean [SD] age 83.1 [5.8] years and 77% women). TUG performance did not differ between groups at 6 months (adjusted difference 1.37, SE 1.32, 95% CI 1.26 to 4.01, p = 0.30). Secondary outcomes did not differ between groups at 6 or 12 months except compliance to the exercise program was higher in the coaching than the control group at 6 months (adjusted difference 1.0, SE 0.5, 95% CI 0.02 to 2.0, p = 0.05).
conclusionsThe lack of difference between the groups in the time taken to complete the TUG at 6 months suggests that the monthly telephone coaching sessions did not improve the effectiveness of a home exercise programme in elderly people who had suffered at least one fall. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02828826; 11th of july 2016, last modification 16th of September 2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.