Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39462307›Full record

ArticleInternational forum of allergy & rhinology2025

Development and validation of the four-item Concise Aging adults Smell Test to screen for olfactory dysfunction in older adults.

Zachary M Soler, Mathew J Gregoski, Preeti Kohli, Kristina A LaPointe, Rodney J Schlosser

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07660887 (Olfactory Dysfunction in Aging Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07660887 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

Olfactory Dysfunction in Aging Adults

TypeobservationalSponsorMedical University of South CarolinaRan2027 to 2032Enrolled500ConditionsOlfactory DysfunctionArmsClinical and Biomarker Assessments
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Olfactory Decline in Elderly at High Altitudes: A Narrative Review.International journal of general medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zachary M SolerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Mathew J GregoskiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Preeti KohliDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Kristina A LaPointeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Rodney J SchlosserDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6480-0275

Funding

Olfactory Dysfunction in Aging AdultsR01DC019078 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SCHLOSSER, RODNEY JON · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019078NIH HHS 5R01DC019078-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlfactory dysfunction (OD) in the elderly is common and associated with numerous comorbidities, yet often underrecognized. This study sought to develop an instrument for widespread screening of this condition.

methodsDemographic factors, comorbidities, and olfactory-related questions were examined in a focus group (N = 20) and development cohort (N = 190). The 4-item Concise Aging adults Smell Test (4-CAST) screening instrument was then developed to predict OD on Sniffin Sticks testing. An independent validation cohort (N = 147) was then examined to confirm ability of the 4-CAST to predict OD on Smell Identification Test 40 (SIT40).

resultsThe most important variables for predicting olfactory loss in older subjects were age, type II diabetes status, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of overall rating of smell, and VAS of impact of smell upon safety. In the development cohort, the 4-CAST model yielded predictive probability (area under the curve) of 0.805 (p < 0.001) for predicting the bottom 25th percentile on Sniffin Sticks. Results were similar in the validation cohort, as the 4-CAST accurately classified 83.8% subjects (area under the curve [AUC] 0.789, p < 0.001) in the bottom 25th percentile of SIT40 testing. The 4-CAST was able to accurately classify 89.4% of subjects with anosmia.

conclusionThe 4-CAST is a quick screening instrument for predicting OD in older adults and has similar performance characteristics in independent populations using the two most common validated olfactory tests. Given the high prevalence of unrecognized olfactory loss in this population, this can be a useful tool for practitioners to determine which subjects may benefit from more extensive olfactory testing.

Indexed as

AgingOlfaction DisordersSmellAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle Agedaginghealth screenolfaction

Identifiers

PMID39462307
PMCPMC12066996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.