ArticleAustralasian journal on ageing2025
Prescribing patterns in people living with dementia in the community: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Australasian journal on ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antipsychotic Drug Interactions and Short-Term Mortality Risk in People With Dementia: A National Cohort Study.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Ten-Year Trend in the Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing of Renally-Dependent Medicines in Australian General Practice Patients with Dementia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Prescribing patterns in people living with dementia in the community: A cross-sectional study.Australasian journal on ageing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo identify the prevalence of and factors associated with medication use in people living with dementia in the community.
methodsA cross-sectional study using baseline data from a randomised controlled trial known as the Interdisciplinary Home-bAsed Reablement Program (I-HARP) between 2018 and 2021 in Sydney, Australia. Participants included people with mild-moderate dementia and their carers. Medication use was classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes, while potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were defined using 2019 Beer's Criteria and 2024 Australian list. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with use of medication classes.
resultsA total of 130 people with dementia and their carers were included. Of the people with dementia, 35% were using antidementia medication, 48% psychotropics, 76% PIMs and 65% polypharmacy (≥5 medications). Polypharmacy was associated with the use of psychotropics (adjusted OR [aOR]: 5.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.94-13.39) and PIMs (aOR: 17.38, 95% CI: 5.12-59.02). Higher education level was associated with lower odds of psychotropic use (aOR: .33, 95% CI: .15-.76), and age over 80 years was associated with lower odds of antidementia medication use (aOR: .29; 95% CI: .12-.72).
conclusionsThe use of PIMs, psychotropics and polypharmacy were common in this sample of people with dementia living in the community. Associations were seen between participant characteristics and medication use. Future research should focus on reviewing PIMs and polypharmacy in people with dementia living in the community to assess the impact on health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.