Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39462241›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2024

Blood-brain barrier profile pretreatment is associated with hemorrhagic transformation after endovascular reperfusion.

Richard Leigh, Pierre Seners, Vanessa Rousseau, Soren Christensen, Jean-François Albucher, Amel Drif, Christophe Cognard, Adrien Guenego, Alain Viguier, Agnes Sommet and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Systolic blood pressure targets after successful endovascular thrombectomy: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Richard LeighDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8285-1815
Pierre SenersStanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2134-0691
Vanessa RousseauInserm CIC1436, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Soren ChristensenStanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Jean-François AlbucherInserm CIC1436, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Amel DrifInserm CIC1436, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Christophe CognardDepartment of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Adrien GuenegoDepartment of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7281-1652
Alain ViguierInserm CIC1436, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Agnes SommetInserm CIC1436, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Nicolas RaposoInserm CIC1436, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9152-4445
Lionel CalviereInserm CIC1436, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Anne-Christine JanuelDepartment of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Michael MlynashStanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Fabrice BonnevilleToulouse Neuro Imaging Center, Toulouse, France.
Brice GaudilliereDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Claire ThalamasInserm CIC1436, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Igor SibonNeuroimaging Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Universite de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Thomas TourdiasNeuroimaging Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Universite de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Mikael MazighiInterventional Neuroradiology Department, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.
Jeremy J HeitRadiology Department, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1055-8000
Benjamin MaierInterventional Neuroradiology Department, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3993-1024
Gregory W AlbersStanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Jean-Marc OlivotInserm CIC1436, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2027-2276
FRAME Investigators

Funding

Global Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption and Post-Stroke Cognitive DeclineR01NS123386 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RICHARD LEIGH · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
American Heart Association : 23IPA1043237NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123386NINDS NIH HHS R01NS123386the French Ministry of Health, Clinical Research Hospital Program PHRCI-15-076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile advances in endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) have led to high reperfusion rates, most patients treated with EVT do not avoid disability. Post-reperfusion hemorrhagic transformation (HT) is a potential target for improving outcomes. This study examined pretreatment blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption in tissue that would subsequently become part of the final infarct to evaluate its role in post-EVT HT.

methodsThis post hoc analysis of the FRAME study, which enrolled patients with anterior large vessel occlusion who received EVT within 6 hours of onset, included patients if they had successful pretreatment MRI perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) and underwent successful EVT. BBB disruption was measured as the percent signal change due to gadolinium leakage on the PWI source images prior to thrombectomy. Mean permeability derangement (MPD) was defined as the average of all voxels in the stroke core that are two standard deviations above normal. The primary outcome was hemorrhagic transformation with parenchymal hematoma (PH).

resultsIn total, 164 patients were included; mean age was 71 and 48% were female. PH occurred in 57 patients. Median MPD was 13.5% for patients with PH versus 3.6% for patients without (p < 0.0001). Elevated MPD was independently associated with PH with a 20% increased risk of PH for each 5% increase in MPD (OR 1.206; 95% CI 1.037:1.405; p = 0.0147, adjusted for NIHSS and procedure duration).

conclusionsEven in patients who are successfully recanalized in an early time window, pretreatment BBB disruption in regions that go on to infarct is associated with an increased risk of post-EVT HT.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierEndovascular ProceduresThrombectomyAgedAged, 80 and overCerebral HemorrhageFemaleHumansIschemic StrokeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedReperfusion

Identifiers

PMID39462241
PMCPMC11651177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.