Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39462130›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Security analysis and provision of authentication protocol, based on peer-to-peer structure in IOT platform.

Dongdong Liu, Tiantian Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dongdong LiuSchool of Computer and Information Engineering, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang, 236037, Anhui, China. 200607017@fynu.edu.cn.
Tiantian JiSchool of Computer and Information Engineering, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang, 236037, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet of Things technology allows you to transfer data to any asset through communication networks such as the Internet or intranet. One of the most important problems is security, which includes confidentiality, authenticity validation, and completeness. Among security problems, the most important ones are ensuring authenticity and protecting privacy. The elliptic curve encryption algorithm is famous protocols for maintaining privacy and verifying authenticity. Despite the capabilities they have and provide good security against network attacks, they face challenges such as response time, delay in the authentication and authentication process, as well as the amount of memory consumed. Two-factor authentication (2FA) is a security process where users provide two different authentication factors to authenticate themselves. It also provides a higher level of security than authentication methods that rely on single-factor authentication (SFA). This article presents two novel methods for 2FA that use encryption techniques, scramble architecture, and chord architecture. These methods allow for the authentication process to be initiated by both parties involved in the communication. Three scenarios and three metrics of reaction time, memory usage, and connection latency were used to assess the efficacy of the suggested approach. The average reaction time is improved and is 0.012 s when the lengths of the finger table in the chord structure are increased to 10, 15, and 20. The findings show that the suggested approach reduces computing complexity, reaction time, and communication latency. It has an average reaction time of 0.016 s, an average memory use of 30,360 kb, and an average connection latency of 0.042 s.

Indexed as

Chord ArchitectureInternet of thingsSecurityTwo-factor authenticationVerification of Style authenticity

Identifiers

PMID39462130
PMCPMC11513113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.