Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39462124›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Efficiency of multivariate tests in trials in progressive supranuclear palsy.

Elham Yousefi, Mohamed Gewily, Franz König, Günter Höglinger, Franziska Hopfner, Mats O Karlsson, Robin Ristl, Sonja Zehetmayer, Martin Posch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantitative Comparisons of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale Versions Using Item Response Theory.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elham YousefiCenter for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Mohamed GewilyDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Franz KönigCenter for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Günter HöglingerDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany.
Franziska HopfnerDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany.
Mats O KarlssonDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Robin RistlCenter for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sonja ZehetmayerCenter for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin PoschCenter for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. martin.posch@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC 2145 SyNergy - ID 390857198DFG grants HO2402/18-1 MSAomicsDFG grants HO2402/6-2European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases Improve-PSPGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01EK1605A HitTauGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research BMBF: 01KU1403A EpiPD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring disease progression in clinical trials for testing novel treatments for multifaceted diseases as progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), remains challenging. In this study we assess a range of statistical approaches to compare outcomes as measured by the items of the progressive supranuclear palsy rating scale (PSPRS). We consider several statistical approaches, including sum scores, a modified PSPRS rating scale that had been recommended by FDA in a pre-IND meeting, multivariate tests, and analysis approaches based on multiple comparisons of the individual items. In addition, we propose two novel approaches which measure disease status based on Item Response Theory models. We assess the performance of these tests under various scenarios in an extensive simulation study and illustrate their use with a re-analysis of the ABBV-8E12 clinical trial. Furthermore, we discuss the impact of the FDA-recommended scoring of item scores on the power of the statistical tests. We find that classical approaches as the PSPRS sum score demonstrate moderate to high power when treatment effects are consistent across the individual items. The tests based on Item Response Theory (IRT) models yield the highest power when the simulated data are generated from an IRT model. The multiple testing based approaches have a higher power in settings where the treatment effect is limited to certain domains or items. The study demonstrates that there is no one-size-fits-all testing procedure for evaluating treatment effects using PSPRS items; the optimal method varies based on the specific effect size patterns. The efficiency of the PSPRS sum score, while generally robust and straightforward to apply, varies depending on the specific patterns of effect sizes encountered and more powerful alternatives are available in specific settings. These findings can have important implications for the design of future clinical trials in PSP and similar multifaceted diseases.

Indexed as

Supranuclear Palsy, ProgressiveClinical Trials as TopicDisease ProgressionHumansMultivariate AnalysisClinical trialsItem response theoryMultiple endpointsMultivariate testsProgressive supranuclear palsySimulation study

Identifiers

PMID39462124
PMCPMC11514033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.