ArticleScientific reports2024
Virtual resection evaluation based on sEEG propagation network for drug-resistant epilepsy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drug-resistant epilepsy with frequent seizures are considered to undergo surgery to become seizure-free, but seizure-free rates have not dramatically improved, partly due to imprecise intervention locations. To address this clinical need, we construct effective connectivity to reveal epilepsy brain dynamics. Based on the propagation path captured by the high order effective connectivity, calculate the control centrality evaluation scheme of the excised area. We used three datasets: simulation dataset, clinical dataset, and public dataset. The epileptogenic propagation network was quantified by calculating high-order effective connection to obtain accurate propagation path, based on this, combined with the outdegree index for virtual resection. By removing electrodes and recalculating control centrality, we quantify each electrode or region's control centrality to evaluate the virtual resection scheme. Three datasets obtained consistent results. We track the accurate propagation path and find the obvious inflection points occurring during the excision process. The minimum intervention targets were obtained by comparing different schemes without recurrence. The clinical data with multiple seizures found that after resection, the brain reaches a stable state and is less likely to continue spreading. By quantitative analysis of control centrality to evaluate the possible excision scheme, finally we obtain the best intervention area for epilepsy, which assist in developing surgical plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.