ArticleScientific reports2024
Ensemble of hybrid model based technique for early detecting of depression based on SVM and neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- IDMBD: Intelligent Diagnostic Modelling of Bipolar Disorder at its early onset.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A hybrid SMOTE and Gaussian mixture model based optimized XGBoost framework for bipolar disorder detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mobile Mental Health Screening in EmotiZen via the Novel Brain-Inspired MCoG-LDPSNet.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Depression Recognition Using Daily Wearable-Derived Physiological Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrating ensemble machine learning and multi-omics approaches to identify Dp44mT as a novel anti-Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Establishment and comparison of three fear of progression risk prediction models for gynecological malignancies patients based on machine learning.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Explaining factors influencing students' depression with a deep learning approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prevalence of depression has increased dramatically over the last several decades: it is frequently overlooked and can have a significant impact on both physical and mental health. Therefore, it is crucial to develop an automated detection system that can instantly identify whether a person is depressed. Currently, machine learning (ML) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) are among the most promising approaches for developing automated computer-based systems to predict several mental health issues, such as depression. This study propose an ensemble of hybrid model-based techniques that aims to build a strong detection model that considers many psychological and sociodemographic characteristics of an individual to detect whether a person is depressed. Support vector machines (SVM) and multilayer perceptrons (MLP) are the two fundamental methods used to construct the suggested ensemble approach. The hybrid DeprMVM served as a meta-learner. In this study, the hybrid DeprMVM is a level-1 learner, whereas the SVM and MLP networks are level-0 learners. After the classifiers are trained and tested at level 0, their outputs are based on both the independent and dependent variables in the new data set that was used to train the meta-classifier. The training data class imbalance was reduced by applying the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) and cluster sampling together, which improved the accuracy for detecting depression. Additionally, it can effectively reduce the risk of over-fitting from simply duplicating data points. To further confirm the effectiveness of the proposed method, various performance evaluation metrics were calculated and compared with previous studies conducted on this specific dataset. In conclusion, among all the techniques for identifying depression, the suggested ensemble approach had the best accuracy, at 99.39%, and an F1-score of 99.51%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.