Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39462034›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The prognostic impact of maximal aortic diameter on acute type B aortic dissection progression in a Chinese population.

Xianming Tang, Shuangfa Qiu, Xin Sun, Guifang Yang, Lijuan Sheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xianming TangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Shuangfa QiuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xin SunCollege of Nursing, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, China.
Guifang YangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Lijuan ShengClinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. shenglijuannice1006@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

Hunan Health and Family Planning Commission Project 202214053517Hunan Health and Family Planning Commission Project B202310007057Natural Science Foundation of Changsha kq2208330Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2023JJ40867The key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province 2019SK2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, evidence concerning the link between maximal aortic diameter and in-hospital mortality in cases of acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) is insufficient. Thus, this study aimed to explore the relationship between the maximal aortic diameter at the time of admission and the early prognosis of patients diagnosed with ATBAD. A total of 678 patients with ATBAD were included between January 2016 and December 2018, during which their clinical data was gathered. The independent variable analyzed was the maximal diameter of the aorta, while the dependent variable was mortality during hospitalization. Factors considered in this analysis included the patients' age, gender, body mass index (BMI), medical history of hypertension, stroke, diabetes, atherosclerosis, smoking habits, chronic kidney insufficiency, time until presentation, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, ejection fraction, presence of aortic regurgitation, symptoms, involvement of abdominal vessels, laboratory findings, and treatment approaches. Of these patients collected, the mean age was 56.03 ± 12.22 years, and approximately 82.45% of them were male. After analysis, it was found that the maximal aortic diameter of patients with ATBAD was positively correlated with in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.10). Surprisingly, a J curve relationship was detected between maximal aortic diameter (point 31 mm) and in-hospital death for patients with ATBAD. The effect sizes and confidence intervals of the right (maximal aortic diameter > 31 mm) and left (maximal aortic diameter ≤ 31 mm) aspects of the inflection point were 1.06 (1.02-1.11) and 1.03 (0.83-1.28), respectively. In addition, the stratified analysis showed a stable relationship between maximal aortic diameter and in-hospital mortality, while there was no significant difference in the interaction between different subgroups. In patients with ATBAD, a J-curve relationship was identified between the maximal aortic diameter and in-hospital mortality. Specifically, when the maximal aortic diameter exceeds 31 mm, a positive correlation with in-hospital death was observed.

Indexed as

Aortic DissectionDisease ProgressionHospital MortalityAcute DiseaseAgedAortaChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAcute type B aortic dissectionIn-hospital mortalityMaximal aortic diameter

Identifiers

PMID39462034
PMCPMC11513997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.