ArticleScientific reports2024
Brain-to-blood transport of fluorescein in vitro.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic hypertension and social isolation disrupt the blood-brain barrier and memory in a sex-dependent manner.Neurobiology of disease · 2026Article
- Modeling blood-brain barrier-glioblastoma interactions: implications for chemoresistance and therapeutic targeting.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2026Review
- Review
- Functional and Transcriptional Disruption of Hepatic ABC Transporters by Environmentally Relevant Short-Chain Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS).Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology · 2025Article
- Astrocytes and Tinnitus.Brain sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Investigating blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction has become a pre-clinical and clinical research focus as it accompanies many neurological disorders. Nevertheless, knowledge of how diagnostic BBB tracers cross the endothelium from blood-to-brain or vice versa often remains incomplete. In particular, brain-to-blood transport (efflux) may reduce tracer extravasation of intravascularly (i.v.) applied tracers. Conversely, impaired efflux could mimic phenotypic extravasation. Both processes would affect conclusions on BBB properties primarily attributed to blood-to-brain leakage. Here, we specifically investigated efflux of fluorescent BBB tracers, focusing on the most common non-toxic marker, sodium fluorescein, which is applicable in patients. We used acute neocortical slices from mice and applied fluorescein, sulforhodamine-B, rhodamine-123, FITC dextran to the artificial cerebrospinal fluid. Anionic low molecular weight (MW) fluorescein and sulforhodamine-B, but not ~ 10-fold larger FITC-dextran and cationic low MW rhodamine-123, showed efflux into the lumen of blood vessels. Our data suggest that fluorescein efflux depends on organic anion transporter polypeptides (Oatp) rather than P-glycoprotein. Furthermore, sodium-potassium ATPase inhibition and incomplete oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD, 20% O
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.