Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39461921›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Assessing the accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT for responding to patient inquiries about otosclerosis.

Utku Mete, Ömer Afşın Özmen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Does ChatGPT update itself? Accuracy of ChatGPT in tympanostomy tube guidance: A comparative analysis with current literature.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Postoperative Management of Tympanoplasty with ChatGPT-4.0.The journal of international advanced otology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Utku MeteDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bursa Uludag University, Faculty of Medicine, Görükle Center Campus, Nilüfer, Bursa, 16059, Turkey. drutkumete@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0902-8061
Ömer Afşın ÖzmenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bursa Uludag University, Faculty of Medicine, Görükle Center Campus, Nilüfer, Bursa, 16059, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9698-0546

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients increasingly use chatbots powered by artificial intelligence to seek information. However, there is a lack of reliable studies on the accuracy and reproducibility of the information provided by these models. Therefore, we conducted a study investigating the ChatGPT's responses to questions about otosclerosis.

methods96 otosclerosis-related questions were collected from internet searches and websites of professional institutions and societies. Questions are divided into four sub-categories. These questions were directed at the latest version of ChatGPT Plus, and these responses were assessed by two otorhinolaryngology surgeons. Accuracy was graded as correct, incomplete, mixed, and irrelevant. Reproducibility was evaluated by comparing the consistency of the two answers to each specific question.

resultsThe overall accuracy and reproducibility rates of GPT-4o for correct answers were found to be 64.60% and 89.60%, respectively. The findings showed correct answers for accuracy and reproducibility for basic knowledge were 64.70% and 91.20%; for diagnosis & management, 64.0% and 92.0%; for medical & surgical treatment, 52.95% and 82.35%; and for operative risks & postoperative period, 75.0% and 90.0%, respectively. There were no significant differences found between the answers and groups in terms of accuracy and reproducibility (p = 0.073 and p = 0.752, respectively).

conclusionGPT-4o achieved satisfactory accuracy results, except in the diagnosis & management and medical & surgical treatment categories. Reproducibility was generally high across all categories. With the audio and visual communication capabilities of GPT-4o, under the supervision of a medical professional, this model can be utilized to provide medical information and support for otosclerosis patients.

Indexed as

InternetOtosclerosisGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesArtificial intelligenceChatGPTHearing lossLarge language modelsOtosclerosisPatient information

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.