Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39461920›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Timing of bilateral sequential cochlear implantation for children: determination of its benefit.

Chiung-Wen Hsu, Pei-Hsuan Ho, Chia-Huei Chu, Pey-Yu Chen, Hsiao-Man Hsu, Yu-Lin Cheng, Xiang-Xiang Chen, I-Hsiu Chen, Yung-Chen Sun, Hung-Ching Lin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chiung-Wen Hsu *Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Pei-Hsuan Ho *Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chia-Huei ChuDepartment of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Pey-Yu ChenDepartment of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Hsiao-Man HsuDepartment of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Yu-Lin ChengDepartment of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Xiang-Xiang ChenDepartment of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
I-Hsiu ChenDepartment of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Yung-Chen SunDepartment of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Hung-Ching LinDepartment of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan. hclin59@ms29.hinet.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8698-4212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate monosyllable word recognition in noise under different conditions in bilateral sequential cochlear implants (CIs). Second, to assess subjective hearing benefits among bilateral sequential CIs, bimodal hearing, and CI-only groups. Lastly, to analyze the prognostic factors affecting CI outcomes in children with bilateral sequential CIs.

methodsSixty-five children with CI were enrolled. Mandarin monosyllable recognition tests in noise and the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) were used to assess post-CI outcomes. The SSQ benefits were compared among children with bilateral CIs, bimodal hearing, and CI-only.

resultsBilateral CIs significantly outperformed the first or second CI alone using in noise. The bilateral CI group had significantly better SSQ scores for speech, qualities, and total scores compared to the CI-only group. Additionally, 41% of the variance in speech perception of the second CI can be attributed to the inter-implantation interval between bilateral CIs.

conclusionBilateral sequential CIs can enhance speech perception in noise and daily life-functioning for children. Earlier implantation of bilateral sequential CIs results in better outcomes, while inter-implantation interval exceeding 9.6 years between bilateral CIs may lead to poor second CI performance in noise. Therefore, early bilateral sequential CIs should be encouraged.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsHearing Loss, BilateralSpeech PerceptionAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleNoiseTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBilateral sequential cochlear implantsDaily life-functioningInter-implantation intervalsWord recognition in noise

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.