Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39461914›Full record

ArticleBrain informatics2024

Advancing EEG prediction with deep learning and uncertainty estimation.

Mats Tveter, Thomas Tveitstøl, Christoffer Hatlestad-Hall, Ana S Pérez T, Erik Taubøll, Anis Yazidi, Hugo L Hammer, Ira R J Hebold Haraldsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mats TveterDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. matstv@ous-hf.no.
Thomas TveitstølDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Christoffer Hatlestad-HallDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ana S Pérez TDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Erik TaubøllInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anis YazidiDepartment of Computer Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Hugo L HammerDepartment of Computer Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Ira R J Hebold HaraldsenDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 964220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep Learning (DL) has the potential to enhance patient outcomes in healthcare by implementing proficient systems for disease detection and diagnosis. However, the complexity and lack of interpretability impede their widespread adoption in critical high-stakes predictions in healthcare. Incorporating uncertainty estimations in DL systems can increase trustworthiness, providing valuable insights into the model's confidence and improving the explanation of predictions. Additionally, introducing explainability measures, recognized and embraced by healthcare experts, can help address this challenge. In this study, we investigate DL models' ability to predict sex directly from electroencephalography (EEG) data. While sex prediction have limited direct clinical application, its binary nature makes it a valuable benchmark for optimizing deep learning techniques in EEG data analysis. Furthermore, we explore the use of DL ensembles to improve performance over single models and as an approach to increase interpretability and performance through uncertainty estimation. Lastly, we use a data-driven approach to evaluate the relationship between frequency bands and sex prediction, offering insights into their relative importance. InceptionNetwork, a single DL model, achieved 90.7% accuracy and an AUC of 0.947, and the best-performing ensemble, combining variations of InceptionNetwork and EEGNet, achieved 91.1% accuracy in predicting sex from EEG data using five-fold cross-validation. Uncertainty estimation through deep ensembles led to increased prediction performance, and the models were able to classify sex in all frequency bands, indicating sex-specific features across all bands.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningEEGEnsemblesMachine learningUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID39461914
PMCPMC11512943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.