ArticleBMJ open2024
Rapid Access Diagnostics for Asthma (RADicA): protocol for a prospective cohort study to determine the optimum series of investigations to diagnose asthma using conventional and novel tests.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exhaled breath volatiles for asthma diagnosis: discovery and validation in untreated but symptomatic patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Global Initiative for Asthma Updates for Diagnosing Asthma in Adults.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- What do patients think about home-based testing for better asthma diagnosis? Insights from a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe diagnosis of asthma is often based on characteristic patterns of symptoms in the absence of an alternative explanation, resulting in over and under diagnosis. Therefore, diagnostic guidelines usually recommend including confirmation of variable airflow obstruction. Some recommend using a sequence of objective tests; however the tests used, the specific cut-off values and the specified order are yet to be validated. We aimed to determine the optimal cut-off values and series of investigations to diagnose asthma. We also explore the potential for novel tests of small airways function and biomarkers, which could be incorporated into future diagnostic pathways. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Rapid Access Diagnostics for Asthma study is an observational study of 300 symptomatic patients with 'clinician-suspected asthma' and healthy controls (aged ≥3 to <70 years), recruited from primary and secondary care in Greater Manchester, UK. Symptomatic participants will undergo four core visits and one optional visit. Participants will complete two baseline visits and undergo a series of established (spirometry, bronchodilator reversibility, exhaled nitric oxide, home peak flow monitoring and bronchial challenge testing) and novel tests. Following visit 2, participants will receive monitored medium-dose inhaled corticosteroid therapy for 6-8 weeks, after which they will return for repeat testing. Patients will be diagnosed with asthma by 'expert panel' opinion (minimum two respiratory specialists) on review of all data (excluding novel tests) pre and post treatment. Healthy controls will attend two visits to establish reference intervals and calculate repeatability coefficients for novel tests where there is a lack of evidence on what threshold constitutes a 'normal' set of values. The primary end point is to determine the optimum diagnostic pathway for diagnosing asthma. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by Greater Manchester East Research Ethics Committee (18/NW/0777). All participants or parents/guardians are required to provide written informed consent and children to provide written assent. The results will be published in peer-review journals and disseminated widely at conferences and with the help of Asthma and Lung UK (www.asthmaandlung.org.uk). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11676160.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.