ArticleBMJ open2024
Contactless monitoring to prevent self-harm and suicide in custodial settings: Protocol for a global scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSelf-harm and suicide are major contributors to the global burden of disease and people in custodial settings are at a markedly increased risk of these adverse outcomes. Contactless monitoring technology is emerging as a possible solution to prevent self-harm and suicide by detecting and predicting vulnerabilities among people at increased risk in custodial settings in realtime, however no reviews to date have synthesized the evidence base, in the custodial context, regarding (a) the extent to which this technology has been implemented; and (b) the acceptability and feasibility of its application among custodial staff, specifically in relation to maintaining the wellbeing and safety of both incarcerated people and custodial professionals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our scoping review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. We searched key electronic health and social science databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest and Google Scholar) on 5 February 2024 for peer-reviewed studies, which report on the use of contactless monitoring in custodial settings. Any type of study design was eligible, and the publication format was not limited. We included quantitative peer-reviewed journal articles, all types of reviews (narrative, systematic and meta-analysis) and did not apply study eligibility restrictions on country of origin. We will also search grey literature. Inclusion of publications will be restricted to the English language. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review does not require institutional ethics review or approval as it is a review of studies that have already been granted relevant ethics approval. Our dissemination strategy includes a peer-reviewed publication and presentations at relevant national and international academic conferences. A plain language summary will be distributed through consumers and professional networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.