Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39461861›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

INhaled Sedation versus Propofol in REspiratory failure in the Intensive Care Unit (INSPiRE-ICU1): protocol for a randomised, controlled trial.

Christina Boncyk, John W Devlin, Hina Faisal, Timothy D Girard, Steven H Hsu, Craig S Jabaley, Ida Sverud, Magnus Falkenhav, John Kress, Karen Sheppard and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05312385 (A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Assessor-Blinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol for Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Adult Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05312385 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Assessor-Blinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol for Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Adult Patients (INSPiRE-ICU1)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSedana MedicalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled277ConditionsSedationArmsIsoflurane, Propofol, Isoflurane (run-ins)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Volatile anesthetics in the intensive care unit.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christina BoncykDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9661-4696
John W DevlinNortheastern University Bouvé College of Health Sciences School of Pharmacy, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hina FaisalDepartment of Surgery, Anesthesiology, and Center for Critical Care, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Timothy D GirardCenter for Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) in the Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Steven H HsuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Craig S JabaleyDepartment of Anesthesiology and the Emory Critical Care Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6687-3953
Ida SverudSedana Medical AB, Danderyd, Sweden.
Magnus FalkenhavSedana Medical AB, Danderyd, Sweden.
John KressDepartment of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Karen SheppardCritical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship (CIBS) Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Peter V SackeySedana Medical AB, Danderyd, Sweden.
Christopher G HughesDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA christopher.hughes@vumc.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSedation in mechanically ventilated adults in the intensive care unit (ICU) is commonly achieved with intravenous infusions of propofol, dexmedetomidine or benzodiazepines. Significant limitations associated with each can impact their usage. Inhaled isoflurane has potential benefit for ICU sedation due to its safety record, sedation profile, lack of metabolism and accumulation, and fast wake-up time. Administration in the ICU has historically been restricted by the lack of a safe and effective delivery system for the ICU. The Sedaconda Anaesthetic Conserving Device-S (Sedaconda ACD-S) has enabled the delivery of inhaled volatile anaesthetics for sedation with standard ICU ventilators, but it has not yet been rigorously evaluated in the USA. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled isoflurane delivered via the Sedaconda ACD-S compared with intravenous propofol for sedation of mechanically ventilated ICU adults in USA hospitals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: INhaled Sedation versus Propofol in REspiratory failure in the ICU (INSPiRE-ICU1) is a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, assessor-blinded trial that aims to enrol 235 critically ill adults in 14 hospitals across the USA. Eligible patients are randomised in a 1.5:1 ratio for a treatment duration of up to 48 (±6) hours or extubation, whichever occurs first, with primary follow-up period of 30 days and additional follow-up to 6 months. Primary outcome is percentage of time at target sedation range. Key secondary outcomes include use of opioids during treatment, spontaneous breathing efforts during treatment, wake-up time at end of treatment and cognitive recovery after treatment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Trial protocol has been approved by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and central (Advarra SSU00208265) or local institutional review boards ((IRB), Cleveland Clinic IRB FWA 00005367, Tufts HS IRB 20221969, Houston Methodist IRB PRO00035247, Mayo Clinic IRB Mod22-001084-08, University of Chicago IRB21-1917-AM011 and Intermountain IRB 033175). Results will be presented at scientific conferences, submitted for publication, and provided to the FDA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05312385.

Indexed as

Hypnotics and SedativesIntensive Care UnitsPropofolRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory InsufficiencyAdministration, InhalationAdultAnesthetics, InhalationCritical IllnessHumansIsofluraneProcedural SedationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited StatesAnesthetics, InhalationHypnotics and SedativesIsofluranePropofolClinical TrialINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CAREPropofolRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID39461861
PMCPMC11529737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.